2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Incremental Prognostic Value of the Incorporation of Myocardial Perfusion Assessment into Clinical Testing with Stress Echocardiography Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study, using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) which assesses myocardial perfusion and wall motion simultaneously, showed excellent sensitivity for MCE (93%) for predicting abnormal FFR, but numbers were smaller and patients predominantly had single vessel disease (where sensitivity was 81% in the present study) (14). The higher sensitivity of MCE can be explained by the fact that perfusion abnormalities precede wall thickening abnormalities (19,20). Similar to the present study a large proportion of negative FFR patients, had positive MCE (57%) but unlike the present study hard outcomes were not examined (14).…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance Of Se Versus Ffrmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…A recent study, using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) which assesses myocardial perfusion and wall motion simultaneously, showed excellent sensitivity for MCE (93%) for predicting abnormal FFR, but numbers were smaller and patients predominantly had single vessel disease (where sensitivity was 81% in the present study) (14). The higher sensitivity of MCE can be explained by the fact that perfusion abnormalities precede wall thickening abnormalities (19,20). Similar to the present study a large proportion of negative FFR patients, had positive MCE (57%) but unlike the present study hard outcomes were not examined (14).…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance Of Se Versus Ffrmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…160 A recent study also showed that when MCE was performed routinely during SE in the day-to-day clinical service where MCE was used in decision making provided improved prognostic outcome over wall motion. 159 The incremental prognostic value of MCE in SE was demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis. 172 Figure 9 Apical four-chamber view at rest (left) demonstrating normal myocardial perfusion at rest (5 s after myocardial contrast destruction).…”
Section: Myocardial Contrast Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The incorporation of MCE into an exercise stress test is challenging but has been shown to be feasible with improvement of both left ventricular wall assessment and perfusion [23, 24]. It is known that a perfusion defect precedes a wall motion abnormality in the ischemic cascade.…”
Section: Clinical Utility Of Contrast Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%