1963
DOI: 10.2307/2844243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Indian Stone Age Sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…African (e.g. Allchin 1959Allchin , 1963 sequences for comparisons. Partly as a result of the dating of sites in relation to sequences elsewhere in the world, microlithic technology in South Asia was originally considered wholly or primarily a Holocene phenomenon (Misra 1985(Misra , 2001.…”
Section: The Late Palaeolithic Of South Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…African (e.g. Allchin 1959Allchin , 1963 sequences for comparisons. Partly as a result of the dating of sites in relation to sequences elsewhere in the world, microlithic technology in South Asia was originally considered wholly or primarily a Holocene phenomenon (Misra 1985(Misra , 2001.…”
Section: The Late Palaeolithic Of South Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence for the rapid rate of reddening is consistent with the preservation of the morphology of the sands, and with the archaeological artefacts (microliths) on the surface of the sands. Microliths have been dated elsewhere in the subcontinent to less than 10,000 years, and more probably 4000-8000 BP (Allchin 1963). Foote (1883) reportedly found microliths within the sands, although subsequent searches by Zeuner & Allchin (1956) and the author failed to reveal artefacts in situ within undisturbed deposits.…”
Section: Dating the Dune Sandsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From the 1950s onwards, debates around the definition of cultural taxonomies increased. Proposals to switch to a modified African taxonomy—Early (Sohan vs Madras), Middle and Late Stone Ages—drew on differences between Indian, African and European assemblages seeking to divest Indian assemblages from European affiliation (Subbarao 1958; Allchin 1963). At the First International Congress on Asian Archaeology in 1961 (Sankalia 1963; Ghosh 1979), varied schemes were proposed, and it was felt that a committee was needed to examine terminologies.…”
Section: Conclusion: the Decline Of The Madrasien And Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%