2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The indirect immunofluorescence assay using cardiac tissue from chickens, quails and ducks for identification of influenza A virus during an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1): A rapid and simple screening tool for limited resource settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods are categorized based on the type of detection target: nucleic acid-based detection, virus isolation and identification, antigen detection, antibody detection, etc. (Alberini et al 2009;Chen et al 2008;Ho et al 2009;Moore et al 2010;Payungporn et al 2006;Xie et al 2006;Yang et al 2008) The most commonly used detection methods are nucleic acid-based detection, such as reverse-transcription PCR, Real-time PCR, RT-LAMP, antibody detection and antigen detection (Antarasena et al 2007;Deng et al 2011;He et al 2007;Kang et al 2010;Khurana et al 2011;Shahsavandi et al 2011;Yea et al 2010;Zhao et al 2010). However, most of these methods require specialized equipment and highly trained operators, and these detection processes are time consuming, thereby making them impractical for point-of-care (POCT) detection (Yager et al 2008 Quantum dots (QDs) have been broadly used for biological labeling and imaging due to their unique optical properties, i.e., a broad excitation spectrum and a narrow and symmetric emission peak (Lu et al 2011;Medintz et al 2005;Zhou et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are categorized based on the type of detection target: nucleic acid-based detection, virus isolation and identification, antigen detection, antibody detection, etc. (Alberini et al 2009;Chen et al 2008;Ho et al 2009;Moore et al 2010;Payungporn et al 2006;Xie et al 2006;Yang et al 2008) The most commonly used detection methods are nucleic acid-based detection, such as reverse-transcription PCR, Real-time PCR, RT-LAMP, antibody detection and antigen detection (Antarasena et al 2007;Deng et al 2011;He et al 2007;Kang et al 2010;Khurana et al 2011;Shahsavandi et al 2011;Yea et al 2010;Zhao et al 2010). However, most of these methods require specialized equipment and highly trained operators, and these detection processes are time consuming, thereby making them impractical for point-of-care (POCT) detection (Yager et al 2008 Quantum dots (QDs) have been broadly used for biological labeling and imaging due to their unique optical properties, i.e., a broad excitation spectrum and a narrow and symmetric emission peak (Lu et al 2011;Medintz et al 2005;Zhou et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is a growing interest in deploying rapid detection methods in resource-limited settings (Ghosh and Vogt; Hanvoravongchai et al, 2010; Kubo et al, 2010; Ortiz et al, 2009; Oshitani, Kamigaki, and Suzuki, 2008) and expanding non-human influenza surveillance activities (e.g. (Antarasena et al, 2007; Samaan et al, 2011)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that SP 9 -sCP 1 destroys the NDV structure. Immunofluorescence assays are widely used in antiviral research, and strong fluorescence indicates high antigen expression [ 20 22 ]. The results of the present study show that the fluorescence in the SP 9 -sCP 1 treatment group was significantly reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%