1988
DOI: 10.1177/154079698801300102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Individualized Curriculum Sequencing Model: Effects on Skill Acquisition and Generalization

Abstract: The effects of the Individualized Curriculum Se quencing (ICS) model on the acquisition and general ization of skills by two preschoolers with severe handi caps were evaluated using a within-subject multiple probe design across different target responses. Target skills were taught across three classroom activities and routines that occurred during the school day. Daily training trials were distributed across and within activ ities using the skill cluster approach. In addition, con current stimulus variation wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individualized curriculum sequencing model 1. Bambara, Warren, and Komisar (1988) The study had three or more attempts to demonstrate experimental effect. n 1 = less than three data points/phase, 2 = 3 to 4 data points/phase, 3 = 5 or more data points/phase, and 4 = not clear based on information provided.…”
Section: Features and Components Of Ni Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individualized curriculum sequencing model 1. Bambara, Warren, and Komisar (1988) The study had three or more attempts to demonstrate experimental effect. n 1 = less than three data points/phase, 2 = 3 to 4 data points/phase, 3 = 5 or more data points/phase, and 4 = not clear based on information provided.…”
Section: Features and Components Of Ni Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, massed trial training is structured to repeatedly present instructional trials for a single task to the student within a single instructional session (Bambara & Warren, 1992;Westling & Fox, 2004). Previous research on distributed trial instruction has found the strategy to be effective with students with developmental disabilities (Bambara, Warren, & Komisar, 1988;Mulligan et al, 1982;Winterling, Dunlap, & O'Neill, 1987;Wolery, Anthony, Caldwell, Snyder, & Morgante, 2002). In addition, comparative studies have found either that distributed and massed trial interventions are equally effective in promoting student learning (Dunlap, 1984;Dunlap & Koegel, 1980;Koegel & Koegel, 1986;A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%