1989
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The induction of revertants by heavy particles and γ-rays in Salmonella tester strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its sensitivity was comparable to that of other bioassays, such as the other SOS bioassays mentioned and the Ames mutatest (Table 2). An example is given for ␥ rays: in the Ames mutatest, the lower limit of detection, i.e., the dose required to double the number of revertants over the spontaneous level, is in the range of 10 to 15 Gy for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 and 3 to 4 Gy for strain TA102 (9,12). Similarly low detection limits are given for the SOS chromotest, with a range of 5 to 10 Gy (10,11,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its sensitivity was comparable to that of other bioassays, such as the other SOS bioassays mentioned and the Ames mutatest (Table 2). An example is given for ␥ rays: in the Ames mutatest, the lower limit of detection, i.e., the dose required to double the number of revertants over the spontaneous level, is in the range of 10 to 15 Gy for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 and 3 to 4 Gy for strain TA102 (9,12). Similarly low detection limits are given for the SOS chromotest, with a range of 5 to 10 Gy (10,11,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ames mutatest uses a set of strains of Salmonella typhimurium that revert to histidine prototrophy upon exposure to mutagens of specific mechanisms (1,2). Examples are 9-aminoacridine or diethylsulfate, causing frameshift mutations (15), and N-methyl-NЈ-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), sodium azide, or methylmethanesulfonate, causing base pair substitutions (18), as well as oxidative compounds or ionizing radiation (12,16). The Ames mutatest was validated in studies using several hundred chemicals (reviewed in reference 20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the early 1980s, there have been several trials to monitor the effects of ionizing radiation on microorganisms using bacterial cells including the Ames test [1,2]. Before finally applying these methods, several limitations including detection time, detection methods, and sensitivity must be overcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%