2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1074-5521(01)00071-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inefficiency of incisions of ecteinascidin 743–DNA adducts by the UvrABC nuclease and the unique structural feature of the DNA adducts can be used to explain the repair-dependent toxicities of this antitumor agent

Abstract: The inefficient repair incision by the UvrABC nuclease of Et 743-DNA adducts provides a basis for rationalizing the observed repair-dependent cytotoxicities of these DNA adducts, if other associated structural properties of Et 743-DNA adducts are taken into account. In particular, the wedge-shaped Et 743, which forces open the minor groove of DNA, introducing a major groove bend, and the extrahelical protrusion of the C-subunit of Et 743 provide unique characteristics alongside the hydrogen-bonding stabilizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of a putative Rad13/DNA-trabectedin cytotoxic ternary complex is consistent with earlier proposals that a protein/ DNA-trabectedin intermediate in the NER processing of trabectedin-DNA adducts could be trapped and give rise to the formation of cytotoxic complexes (17,38). DNA repair inhibition, rather than excision of the lesion, due to direct immobilization of NER factors by another type of adduct, has also been reported (39).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The formation of a putative Rad13/DNA-trabectedin cytotoxic ternary complex is consistent with earlier proposals that a protein/ DNA-trabectedin intermediate in the NER processing of trabectedin-DNA adducts could be trapped and give rise to the formation of cytotoxic complexes (17,38). DNA repair inhibition, rather than excision of the lesion, due to direct immobilization of NER factors by another type of adduct, has also been reported (39).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1C), whereas the disfavored sequence studied, CGA (34, 35), was not stabilized at all (data not shown). These results are consistent with previous findings using plasmid DNA molecules (35,36) and argues strongly in favor of the view that the hampering of DNA strand separation brought about by the covalent adduct may result in a strong blockade of transcription and replication forks in living cells. This behavior is reminiscent of that elicited by other antineoplastic drugs that give rise to true ICLs such as MMC (37).…”
Section: A Single Trabectedin Adduct Greatly Stabilizes Dsdnasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to the proposed mechanism of action, trabectedin interacts with the transcription-coupled NER system forming cytotoxic complexes that cannot be resolved during the NER processing of DNA adducts (5). Then unrepaired adducts lead to formation of double-strand breaks and subsequent cell-cycle blocking (6) accounting for the fact that the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway has also been reported as important for modulating trabectedin response as the NER system (7,8). In line with these data, a number of works predicted that the clinical sensitivity to trabectedin could be defined by assessing the expression of a series of NER genes independently or along with selected repair factors from the HRR pathway (7,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%