The inexpressibility of validity

Murzi, Julien

doi:10.1093/analys/ant096

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We will therefore call the view that 'valid' satisfies VP and VD the naïve view of validity (Murzi 2014). One first point that deserves emphasis is that, on the naïve view of truth we've assumed at the beginning of this paper, such a view entails V0, our object-language statement of VTP for single-premise arguments.…”

Section: Naïve Validitymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…A second point to notice is that, natural though they may seem, VP and VD lead us into trouble-which should of course be expected, since NEC * and T * are nothing but the key ingredients of the Myhill-Kaplan-Montague Paradox, or Paradox of the Knower (Myhill 1960;Kaplan and Montague 1960;Murzi 2014). 20…”

Section: Naïve Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…21 Call this the Validity Curry, or v-Curry, for short, to contrast it with the standard conditional-involving version of Curry's Paradox, or c-Curry. rejecting SContr, thus adopting a substructural logic-a logic where some of the standardly accepted structural rules fail (Shapiro 2011;Beall and Murzi 2013;Murzi 2014;. Unlike c-Curry, however, the v-Curry Paradox makes no use of →-I, and hence it cannot be invalidated by rejecting such a rule.…”

Section: Validity Currymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the record, we think that even if VTP holds, an explanation of the role of the notion of validity will have to involve normative considerations such as those Field advances 17. For further discussion, seeBeall and Murzi (2013) andMurzi (2014) Shapiro (2011). For further discussion, seeBeall and Murzi (2013) andMurzi (2014) Shapiro (2011).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…SeeRead (2001, fn. For a defence of the claim that Validity Curry is a genuine paradox of validity, see §2.3 below andMurzi (2014).22 This terminology was first introduced inBeall and Murzi (2013). Albert of Saxony includes a contrapositive version of the paradox among his "insolubles"(Read 2010, p. 165).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Unifying the Philosophy of Truth

Achourioti

Galinon

Martínez-Fernández

et al. 2015

Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science aims to reconsider the question of the unity of science in light of recent developments in logic. At present, no single logical, semantical or methodological framework dominates the philosophy of science. However, the editors of this series believe that formal techniques like, for example, independence friendly logic, dialogical logics, multimodal logics, game theoretic semantics and linear logics, have the potential to cast new light on basic issues in the discussion of the unity of science.This series provides a venue where philosophers and logicians can apply specific technical insights to fundamental philosophical problems. While the series is open to a wide variety of perspectives, including the study and analysis of argumentation and the critical discussion of the relationship between logic and the philosophy of science, the aim is to provide an integrated picture of the scientific enterprise in all its diversity.More information about this series at

show abstract

Section: Naïve Validitymentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Naïve Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%