2002
DOI: 10.1002/bltj.2028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inferno™ operating system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singularity differs from other single address operating system, such as Pilot, Cedar, Smalltalk, Lisp Machines, Oberon, or Inferno [12,20,35,39,44], which encouraged sharing objects between processes and did not segregate a process's objects. These systems presented a programming model similar to threads in a process, rather than SIPs' process-like, segmented object spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Singularity differs from other single address operating system, such as Pilot, Cedar, Smalltalk, Lisp Machines, Oberon, or Inferno [12,20,35,39,44], which encouraged sharing objects between processes and did not segregate a process's objects. These systems presented a programming model similar to threads in a process, rather than SIPs' process-like, segmented object spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tubes are optimistic channels. Although there are many different implementations of communication channels for CSP‐like programming (see, for example, ), it is interesting to describe the implementation of tubes as a use case for the new semaphores. Using the semaphores described earlier, the implementation of tubes is extremely easy and straightforward.…”
Section: Optimistic Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of Brasil is a self-contained daemon which is based on a fork of Inferno [4]. Inferno is an open source distributed operating system which is a direct descendant of the Plan 9 operating system [11].…”
Section: Brasilmentioning
confidence: 99%