General Relativity, Cosmology and Astrophysics 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06349-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inflationary Origin of the Seeds of Cosmic Structure: Quantum Theory and the Need for Novel Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approach is sometimes considered as not viable, but as the discussion illustrated in[57][58][59][60][61][62][63] the arguments are not decisive. In particular, an implementation involving a self-induced collapse seems to be completely viable as far as mathematical consistency and phenomenology are concerned[64,65], and at least when regarding these as effective theories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach is sometimes considered as not viable, but as the discussion illustrated in[57][58][59][60][61][62][63] the arguments are not decisive. In particular, an implementation involving a self-induced collapse seems to be completely viable as far as mathematical consistency and phenomenology are concerned[64,65], and at least when regarding these as effective theories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us discuss now how the dynamical reduction of the wave function fits into our general understanding of gravity and its, still incomplete, quantum mechanical characterization (see [85,86] for a more detailed explanation). According to general relativity, gravitation reflects the structure of spacetime itself, whereas quantum theory seems to fit most easily in contexts where this structure is a given one.…”
Section: The Csl Model During Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted inSudarsky (2014), this is connected with issues appearing in other approaches, such as the stochastic gravitation program ofHu and Verdaguer (2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%