1980
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1980.25.1.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of adsorption on the rates oi n degradation of arsenic species in sediments1

Abstract: A model to describe the rates of microbially mediated transformations is presented along with a simple numerical method for kinetic computations in complex systems. The model is tested against the results of arsenic demethylation experiments assuming first-order kinetics and Langmuir adsorption. There is agreement between theory and experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased methyl substitution of As species resulted in both decreased adsorbed As at low As concentrations in solution phases and increased As release from the Fe oxide surface. The adsorption of As species to Al oxides, was As(V) > As(III) > MMA = DMA (Xu et al, 1991) In aerobic soils, the order of sorption was As(V) = M-MA > DMA (Wauchope, 1975) and in aerobic river sediment, the order of sorption was As(V) > MMA > DMA (Holm et al, 1980). Arsenic methylation can be thus regarded as a process of As mobilization in soils and sediments.…”
Section: Release Of Arsenic From Solid To Solution Phases In Fenmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased methyl substitution of As species resulted in both decreased adsorbed As at low As concentrations in solution phases and increased As release from the Fe oxide surface. The adsorption of As species to Al oxides, was As(V) > As(III) > MMA = DMA (Xu et al, 1991) In aerobic soils, the order of sorption was As(V) = M-MA > DMA (Wauchope, 1975) and in aerobic river sediment, the order of sorption was As(V) > MMA > DMA (Holm et al, 1980). Arsenic methylation can be thus regarded as a process of As mobilization in soils and sediments.…”
Section: Release Of Arsenic From Solid To Solution Phases In Fenmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tetramethylarsonium ion (TETRA), arsenobetaine (AsB), arsenocholine (AsC), and arsenosugars, are thought to be originated from biosynthesis, e.g., by alga or microorganisms (Pongratz, 1998;Geiszinger et al, 2002). The toxicity and mobility of As species depends on their chemical forms: inorganic As species are more toxic and less mobile than organic As species (Wauchope, 1975;Holm et al, 1980;Chiu and Hering, 2000;Mandal and Suzuki, 2002). Thus, investigation on the total As (As total ) is not sufficient for risk assessment of As in the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the order of sorption was DMAA<MMAA≈As(V) in aerobic soils (Wauchope 1975). In aerobic river sediment, the order of sorption was DMAA<MMAA<As(V) (Holm et al 1980). Thus, As may become more mobile and bioavailable in soil systems where As methylation is favored.…”
Section: Sorption Behavior and Mobility Of Organic Arsenic Compounds mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As for the inorganic As chemical forms (Livesey and Huang, 1981;Pierce and Moore, 1982) Fe-oxides have been implicated in the sorption of MMAA by soils (Holm et al, 1980). The observed responses of MMAA solubility to redox and pH are likely due to reduced sorption capacity of the soil caused by decreasing redox or increasing pH.…”
Section: Redox-ph Stability Of As Species 249mentioning
confidence: 99%