2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of age and individual differences in executive function on stimulus processing in the oddball task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
35
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with inhibition deficits found on more traditional neuropsychological measures (e.g. West, Schwarb, & Johnson, 2010) and work suggesting ADHD characteristics associated with WS in children and younger adults (Rhodes et al, 2011) Post error slowing after a FA commission error is an important indicator of the executive functions of error monitoring and the re-establishment of controlled processing during sustained attention. In ageing this aspect of executive function is relatively well preserved during continuous performance tasks like the SART described here (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This finding is consistent with inhibition deficits found on more traditional neuropsychological measures (e.g. West, Schwarb, & Johnson, 2010) and work suggesting ADHD characteristics associated with WS in children and younger adults (Rhodes et al, 2011) Post error slowing after a FA commission error is an important indicator of the executive functions of error monitoring and the re-establishment of controlled processing during sustained attention. In ageing this aspect of executive function is relatively well preserved during continuous performance tasks like the SART described here (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Bauer and Hesselbrock (2003) have suggested that those at risk for substance dependence and ASPD have impaired development of frontal brain areas demonstrated by the absence of the normal maturational increases usually seen in P3a amplitude through adolescence. Furthermore, it appears that age-related changes in frontal P3a characteristics seen later in life are accompanied by decrements in executive function in older adults (Friedman, Nessler, Johnson, Ritter, & Bersick, 2008;West, Schwarb, & Johnson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this interpretation is the finding from a study in our lab that cognitively lower performing old adults, presumably with reduced capacity to inhibit the processing of task-irrelevant non-targets, do not generate a larger anterior P2 to novel stimuli than their cognitively high performing counterparts (Riis et al, 2009). However, in this study old subjects were divided according to their composite performance on neuropsychological tests of multiple cognitive domains, leaving open the possibility of a different outcome if old adults were split in terms of performance on tests emphasizing executive function (West, Schwarb, & Johnson, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%