“…For instance, researchers have analyzed the frequency with which different types of force are used before, during, and after OC spray or TASERs are introduced in departments (e.g., Lin & Jones, 2010;Lumb & Friday, 1997). Finally, and most recently, researchers have examined the role that agency policy (e.g., CED placement on use of force continua) plays in determining levels of less lethal weaponry usage (e.g., Bishopp et al, 2014;Crow & Adrion, 2011;Ferdik et al, 2014;Morabito & Doerner, 1997). "Effectiveness" has been defined in three primary ways (Thomas, Collins, & Lovrich, 2010): (a) the ability of OC spray and TASERs to induce subject compliance (e.g., Adang, Kaminski, Howell, & Mensink, 2006;Kaminski, Edwards, & Johnson, 1999;Morabito & Doerner, 1997;White & Ready, 2007, 2010, (b) the ability of OC spray and TASERs to reduce officer and citizen injuries associated with their use (e.g., Kaminski, Edwards, & Johnson, 1998;Kaminski, Engle, Rojek, Smith, & Alpert, 2013;Lin & Jones, 2010;Paoline, Terrill, & Ingram, 2012;Smith, Kaminski, Rojek, Alpert, & Mathis, 2007;Taylor & Woods, 2010;Terrill & Paoline, 2012a), and (c) the reduction in cases of lethal force as a result of their use (Amnesty International, 2004;Ferdik, Kaminski, Cooney, & Sevigny, 2014;Force, 2004;Ho, Dawes, Johnson, Lundin, & Miner, 2007;Smith et al, 2009;Sousa, Ready, & Ault, 2010;Thomas et al, 2010).…”