1995
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/50a.6.b399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Aging on Muscle Strength and Muscle Fiber Characteristics With Special Reference to Eccentric Strength

Abstract: It is well established that aging seriously reduces isometric and concentric muscle strength due to atrophy, deterioration of mechanical properties, and motor unit loss. However, there is limited information on the impact of aging on eccentric strength despite the fact that such forces play an equally important role during daily activities. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of aging on three expressions of muscle strength (isometric, concentric, and eccentric) in relation to muscle fiber c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
163
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
163
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous cross-sectional comparative studies have provided evidence of the relative maintenance of eccentric torque (Horstmann et al, 1999;Hortobagyi et al, 1995;Klass et al, 2005;Porter et al, 1997;Porter et al, 1995;Poulin et al, 1992;Pousson et al, 2001;Vandervoort et al, 1990) and strength (Phillips et al, 1998) in healthy older adults in spite of overall reductions in muscle contractile capacity. For the purposes of this review, muscle torque is defined as the rotatory effect of a force (force x moment arm) assessed with an isokinetic device, while strength is simply the magnitude of force that a muscle can produce (Enoka, 2002).…”
Section: Evidence For the Preservation Of Eccentric Strength In Oldermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous cross-sectional comparative studies have provided evidence of the relative maintenance of eccentric torque (Horstmann et al, 1999;Hortobagyi et al, 1995;Klass et al, 2005;Porter et al, 1997;Porter et al, 1995;Poulin et al, 1992;Pousson et al, 2001;Vandervoort et al, 1990) and strength (Phillips et al, 1998) in healthy older adults in spite of overall reductions in muscle contractile capacity. For the purposes of this review, muscle torque is defined as the rotatory effect of a force (force x moment arm) assessed with an isokinetic device, while strength is simply the magnitude of force that a muscle can produce (Enoka, 2002).…”
Section: Evidence For the Preservation Of Eccentric Strength In Oldermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the studies that support the evidence of the preservation of eccentric strength, including participants' characteristics, muscle groups tested, methods of normalization and magnitude of strength deficits is outlined in table 1. In short, these studies compare muscle torque (Horstmann et al, 1999;Hortobagyi et al, 1995;Klass et al, 2005;Porter et al, 1997;Porter et al, 1995;Poulin et al, 1992;Pousson et al, 2001;Vandervoort et al, 1990) or strength (Phillips et al, 1998) values between groups of young and older individuals to determine whether age-related deficits in strength are consistent across different types of muscle contractions.…”
Section: Evidence For the Preservation Of Eccentric Strength In Oldermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The latter includes fiber loss and atrophy (Larsson et al 1979;Sato et al 1984;Lexell et al 1988), impairments in the excitation-contraction process (Delbono et al 1995;Wang et al 2002), and perturbations to actomyosin cross-bridge function (Larsson et al 1997; Thompson and Brown 1999;Lowe et al 2001;Frontera et al 2000;Hook et al 2001;Krivickas et al 2001). These factors are specific to the mode of muscle contraction, impacting force during isometric and shortening contractions but having much less effect on force during lengthening or eccentric, muscular activity (Porter et al 1997;Poulin et al 1992;Phillips et al 1991;Ochala et al 2006;Hortobagyi et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%