2008
DOI: 10.1080/17441690802076496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of AIDS stigma and discrimination and social cohesion on HIV testing and willingness to disclose HIV in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These directions are consistent with associations reported in prior research [41, 42, 71]. However, findings in this study cannot preclude reverse causality given the cross-sectional nature of these data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These directions are consistent with associations reported in prior research [41, 42, 71]. However, findings in this study cannot preclude reverse causality given the cross-sectional nature of these data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Whilst we aimed to collect data on ART use from 2009, we obtained a low response rate which could be due to HIV-related stigma and discriminations which remains pervasive in this community. 4649 We therefore relied on the district ART data 10, 11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Pathways at the ecological level 19,40 include reduced HIV stigma and discrimination, 37 increased availability of information sharing resources 41 such as education for those at risk, and increase economic and social support for those at risk and already infected with HIV. 42 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%