“…For the authors of the study, nine cases (cases 2,5,8,9,12,18,19,20,21) aroused great concern and doubt-the obtained blood alcohol content was high enough (i.e., higher than 1.70% and amounting to 2.13% , 1.85% , 3.00% , 4.16% , 1.70% , 2.74% , 3.40% , 2.67% , 2.00% , respectively) that allowing an employee to work in a life-threatening condition would be extremely irresponsible. Such an employee would have, and the authors had no doubts about this, come to work in a drunken state, which should have been immediately noticed by the construction supervisor (site manager, foreman).…”