2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of an external symbol system on number parity representation, or What’s odd about 6?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect of laterality also emerged in deaf signers who, like hearing speakers, exhibit a prevalence of right-hand dominance with the relative preference to sign numbers up to five with the right-hand and, for two-handed numbers (6–10), to sign the five-hand shape with the left-hand (Iversen et al, 2006). Similarly, a recent study on blind and sighted children (Crollen et al, 2011) showed that while sighted participants started to count with the dominant hand, i.e., 92% ( N  = 11/12) of the right-handed children started counting with their right-hand and the only left-handed child started counting with his/her left-hand, in blind participants the modulation of hand dominance was less systematic [54%, ( N  = 6/11) of the right-handers were right-starters, the only left-hander was also a left-starter].…”
Section: Is Left- and Right- Starting A Dominance Matter?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This effect of laterality also emerged in deaf signers who, like hearing speakers, exhibit a prevalence of right-hand dominance with the relative preference to sign numbers up to five with the right-hand and, for two-handed numbers (6–10), to sign the five-hand shape with the left-hand (Iversen et al, 2006). Similarly, a recent study on blind and sighted children (Crollen et al, 2011) showed that while sighted participants started to count with the dominant hand, i.e., 92% ( N  = 11/12) of the right-handed children started counting with their right-hand and the only left-handed child started counting with his/her left-hand, in blind participants the modulation of hand dominance was less systematic [54%, ( N  = 6/11) of the right-handers were right-starters, the only left-hander was also a left-starter].…”
Section: Is Left- and Right- Starting A Dominance Matter?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Considering also the different notations employed in our tasks for number symbols and weekday words, it is possible that different verbal-spatial and visuo-spatial concepts were triggered by the item notations (cf. Iversen, Nuerk, Jaeger, & Willmes, 2006;Nuerk, Iversen, & Willmes, 2004), which could be accounted for by different spatial codes available even within ordinal or cardinal sequences. For instance, the assessed dominance of a categorical (e.g., verbal-spatial coding) and linear SNARC (e.g., visuospatial MNL associations) might be stimulus-or taskspecific.…”
Section: Implications For a Common Framework Of Mental Space Activationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses with the right-hand button to the greater numerals were faster than responses with the left-hand button. SNARC effects have also been experimentally confirmed in the case of deaf people who were presented with digits on a computer screen (Bull et al 2005;Iversen et al 2004) and finger layouts designating numbers in sign language (Iversen et al 2006;Bull et al 2006).…”
Section: The Format and Modality Of Numeralsmentioning
confidence: 81%