2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Attention, Learning, and Motivation on Visual Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 412 publications
(601 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously noted, classical computer-based visual search paradigms are limited by tightly controlled environments and abstract target stimuli that do not accurately represent real-life visual search behavior (Dodd & Flowers, 2012). To bridge the gap between laboratory-based and real-life visual search, we present our environment in VR.…”
Section: Time Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously noted, classical computer-based visual search paradigms are limited by tightly controlled environments and abstract target stimuli that do not accurately represent real-life visual search behavior (Dodd & Flowers, 2012). To bridge the gap between laboratory-based and real-life visual search, we present our environment in VR.…”
Section: Time Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that predictions rely on memory representations is grounded in the brain’s ability to extract environmental regularities – a process known as statistical learning (Turk-Browne in Dodd & Flowers, 2012; Siegelman & Frost, 2015). Regularities are abundant in the natural world, such that similar patterns are encountered across time and space (Turk-Browne in Dodd & Flowers, 2012, p. 118).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is strong evidence that the brain can learn and encode patterns of this nature into memory (i.e., that it can engage in statistical learning); for example, classic visual statistical learning tasks show successful learning of triplets of shapes (Fiser & Aslin, 2002) and syllables (Saffran et al, 1996), presented in a continuous sequence (for similar research in mice, see Gavornik & Bear, 2014). This learning also appears relatively implicit, with participants judging patterns as more familiar than random shapes despite being unaware of an underlying relationship and having low confidence in their decisions (Turk-Browne in Dodd & Flowers, 2012, p. 123). This proficiency for pattern learning has been shown to facilitate predictive processing, with research demonstrating enhanced prediction of upcoming visual orientations following structured versus random sequences (Baker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations