2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01794-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Audible Alarm Loudness and Type on Clinical Multitasking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To revisit our goal of improving alarm learnability, discernibility, and relevance, our system demonstrated advances in all three areas. Good participant performance and decreased perceived workload through the use of auditory icons to increase learnability of auditory alarms builds on and supports previous research [ 8 , 27 ]. Our system also utilized multisensory alarms to increase discernibility by aiding in perceiving, locating, and determining priority for alarms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To revisit our goal of improving alarm learnability, discernibility, and relevance, our system demonstrated advances in all three areas. Good participant performance and decreased perceived workload through the use of auditory icons to increase learnability of auditory alarms builds on and supports previous research [ 8 , 27 ]. Our system also utilized multisensory alarms to increase discernibility by aiding in perceiving, locating, and determining priority for alarms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To address this issue, Edworthy et al developed auditory icons, which are auditory sounds with an innate relation to what the alarm signifies (e.g., a lub-dub sound for heart rate monitoring) [ 2 ]. These auditory icons had significantly higher accuracy rates, quicker response times, and improved overall performance when compared to standard alarms [ 2 , 8 ]. After demonstrating success in the research setting, auditory icon alarms were approved for clinical use in the 2020 amendment to the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60,601–1–8 standard [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, both Edworthy and colleagues and Sanderson and colleagues have offered exemplary models in their work on auditory alerts in medical settings. These research programs have performed preliminary field work (Deschamps & Sanderson, 2021;Kristensen et al, 2015) and tested alerts against background noise (Bennett et al, 2019;Bruder et al, 2022), during multitasking (Bruder et al, 2022;Davidson et al, 2019;Deschamps et al, 2022;Knight et al, 2020) , and in the presence of simultaneous auditory alerts (Edworthy et al, 2022), with evaluation research sampling from the target listener end-user populations (Atyeo & Sanderson, 2015;Wright et al, 2020). Sustained, programmatic research programs like these can ensure the successful design of auditory alerts.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment modeled after the experimental paradigm validated by Schlesinger et al (2018) and Bruder et al (2021) manipulated a within-subjects design: a complex visual distraction task type (five types), a speech intelligibility response task (coordinate response measure [CRM]), an easy visual distraction task, alarm type (two types: tonal alarm vs. the informative alarm), alarm level (+2 dB SNR), and background noise (background noise vs. background noise + music [jazz/funk music without vocals to not mask human speech–playlist). Trials were organized into four sequential blocks corresponding to the alarm type and background noise combinations (tonal alarm/informative icon, background noise/background noise + music) with only one type of alarm in each block.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%