EMC 2008 14th European Microscopy Congress 1–5 September 2008, Aachen, Germany
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85156-1_342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of beam defocus on volume growth rates for electron beam induced platinum deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper panel of Figure 4 acts as the control experiment and shows the structure diameter variation as a function of the blurred primary beam for 91 nm•s −1 , which reveals an almost linear behavior as expected. 28 The lower panel summarizes the implications of a defocused, blurred beam on the final segment angles for different PVs. Note, the highest acceptable blur before no 3D-segment can be fabricated is represented by the last data points in the graph for each PV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper panel of Figure 4 acts as the control experiment and shows the structure diameter variation as a function of the blurred primary beam for 91 nm•s −1 , which reveals an almost linear behavior as expected. 28 The lower panel summarizes the implications of a defocused, blurred beam on the final segment angles for different PVs. Note, the highest acceptable blur before no 3D-segment can be fabricated is represented by the last data points in the graph for each PV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted, that this BSE-Pt growth concept can also explain the typically observed dimensions of 1D nanopillars between 50 and 70 nm for MeCpPt(IV)Me 3 precursor on bulk substrates [1][2][3]7,8,38 which are in the same range as the BSE-Pt diameter in contrast to the electron beams which often are an order of magnitude smaller.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In both cases, this effectively leads to an electron beam defocus. As reported by Plank et al [28], the effect of defocusing the primary electron beam leads in FEBID to an increase of the nanowire's diameter. On the other hand, the high electric field will strongly modify the trajectory of the secondary electrons [27], which are also crucial for the FEBID growth, as discussed above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Secondly, the growth of 3D FEBID structures with variable diameter is achieved by in-situ tuning of the beam focus. Although the dimension broadening effect of beam defocus was reported in FEBID [28], in-situ control of this parameter to obtain 3D structures with tailored varying diameters represents a new avenue in the use of FEBID for the growth of functional magnetic, superconducting or photonic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%