2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2028629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Board Structure on the Value of NZX Listed Firms and its Association with Growth Options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in Panel A of Table 3, board size ( BoardSize ) ranges from 3 to 13, with a mean (median) of 6.1 (6.0). These numbers are comparable to those reported for existing New Zealand studies, such as Hossain et al (2001), Prevost et al (2002), Bhuiyan (2010), Dunstan et al (2011), Li (2013), and Fauzi and Locke (2012). The mean (median) proportion of outside (non‐executive) directors ( OustsideDir ) over the sample period is 84% (86%), ranging from 20 to 100%.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As reported in Panel A of Table 3, board size ( BoardSize ) ranges from 3 to 13, with a mean (median) of 6.1 (6.0). These numbers are comparable to those reported for existing New Zealand studies, such as Hossain et al (2001), Prevost et al (2002), Bhuiyan (2010), Dunstan et al (2011), Li (2013), and Fauzi and Locke (2012). The mean (median) proportion of outside (non‐executive) directors ( OustsideDir ) over the sample period is 84% (86%), ranging from 20 to 100%.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Various studies have been conducted in different sectors and geographic location across the globe such as Choi et al (2006), Chan and li (2008), Nazir et al (2009), Dunstan et al (2011), Rouf (2011), Vintila and Gherghina A. Khan et al / Accounting 3 (2017 123 (2013) found that there was a positive and significant relationships between board independent director and firm value. The presence of non-executive directors on board gives a positive signal to the investors and shareholders in particular and stakeholders in general that affairs of the firms are prudently monitored which also increase public confidence and subsequently add to firm value (Hassan & Butt, 2009).…”
Section: Board Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topik yang dibahas Carter et al (2003) memperoleh perhatian dan diikuti oleh sejumlah penelitian serupa dengan menggunakan area sampel penelitian spesifik dari seluruh penjuru dunia, misalnya Nigeria (Ujunwa et al 2012), Selandia Baru (Dunstan et al 2011dan Fauzi et al 2012, Sri Lanka (Wellalage et al 2013), Amerika Serikat (Carter et al 2010dan Colaco et al 2011, Malaysia (Bolbol I. I. H. 2012), Pakistan (Yasser 2012), Spanyol (Fuentes-Medina et al 2013), Italia (Schwizer et al 2012dan Bianco et al 2013, Bangladesh (Dutta 2006), dan Inggris Raya (Martin et al 2009).…”
Section: Abstrakunclassified
“…Perbedaan ini mendorong karyawan perempuan untuk bersikap dan berlaku lebih selaras dengan kebijakan dan peraturan perusahaan. Hal ini juga didukung Dunstan et al (2011) yang menyimpulkan bahwa keragaman gender dalam dewan perusahaan memiliki implikasi penting pada pembuat regulasi perusahaan. Fuentes-Medina et al (2013) menemukan bahwa ROA berkaitan dengan reputasi perusahaan.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified