The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials

Kim, Bokyoung; Bae, Hanna Eun-Kyung; Shim, June‐Sung; Lee, Keun Woo

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.012

Cited by 148 publications

(130 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

111

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…26 Moreover, other researchers have observed morphological alteration of the ceramic surface with an increase in surface porosities. [27][28][29] Furthermore, it could be suggested that hydrolytic degradation during storage is more intense with less surface area interaction between the luting agent and the ceramic. This would have been true for specimens that received airborne particle abrasion in relation to hydrofluoric acid etching, since the irregularities obtained by the acid are deeper, thus better protecting the resin-luting agent from the degradation process.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…19 However, some studies have shown that sandblasting is not the best option to treat zirconium-based ceramics, and it has been suggested that a silica coating application is the better option. 18,22,28 These authors concluded that a silica coating on the ceramic surface achieves a chemical interaction with the resin cement that is similar to silica-based ceramics. It is important to observe that, even though no statistical differences were found among Cercon, IPS Empress and In Ceram Alumina when sandblasted, the bond strength value for Cercon ceramic is almost double that of the control group; for IPS Empress, the value relative to the control group increased 30%, and for In Ceram Alumina, it was 50%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, previous studies have shown that all-ceramic restorations, based on densely sintered high-purity alumina or zirconia and glass infiltrated aluminum oxide, not only resist forming micro-retentive surfaces after hydrofluoric acid etching, but also silanating the surfaces does not promote chemical interaction with the resin material. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]25,28 The current study evaluated the micro-shear bond strength of different surface treatments between strengthened ceramics and a resin-luting agent. Additionally, the conditioned ceramic surfaces were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of a Resin Luting Agent and Four All-ceramic Systems

Torres

Borges

Spohr

et al. 2009

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYObjective. The current study evaluated the micro-shear bond strength between a resin luting agent and four strengthened all-ceramic systems under different surface treatments.Methods. Rectangular specimens of IPS Empress 2 (Ivoclar-Vivadent), Cergogold (DeguDent), In Ceram Alumina (Vita) and Cercon (DeguDent) ceramics were fabricated and randomly divided into three groups: 1-no treatment; 2-etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid and 3-airborne-particle abraded with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles. The ceramic surfaces of the specimens were coated with a silane agent (Clearfil Porcelain Bond, Kuraray), then bonded with a resin-luting agent (Panavia F, Kuraray). A micro-shear bond test was carried out to measure the bond strength. Moreover, each ceramic surface was observed morphologically by scanning electron microscopy. The results were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey's posthoc analysis (p<0.05). SMP Torres • GA Borges • AM Spohr AADB Cury • S Yadav • JA Platt Clinical RelevanceThe bond strength between ceramics and a resin luting agent is affected by the ceramic surface treatment, which is dependent on the ceramic composition. Laboratory ResearchResults. The bond strength of all ceramic systems evaluated was affected by the surface treatments (p<0.05). The highest values for bond strength of IPS Empress 2 were found when the surface treatment used was hydrofluoric acid etching, followed by airborne particle abrasion treatment. On the other hand, airborne particle abrasion treatment and acid etching were not different for Cergogold and In Ceram Alumina ceramics, but they were higher when compared to the control (p<0.05). The highest bond strength to Cercon was found when it was treated with airborne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide. The SEM photographs showed that the hydrofluoric acid etching treatment affected the surface of IPS Empress 2 and Cergogold; however, Cercon and In Ceram surface morphology were not changed by the hydrofluoric acid etching. The airborne particle abrasion treatment altered the Cercon ceramic morphology but it did not change the other ceramic's surface.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of a Resin Luting Agent and Four All-ceramic Systems

Torres

Borges

Spohr

et al. 2009

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…16,17 The silica embedded on the ceramic surface is able to react by silane coupling, and should be more effective than conventional air abrasion. 18,19 This abrasion technique only increases the surface roughness of the zirconia, 20 increasing the bonding surface area, and removes any contaminants from the ceramic surface. 21 Notwithstanding, controversy exists regarding the efficacy any of these treatments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving adhesion between luting cement and zirconia-based ceramic with an alternative surface treatment

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the influence of an alternative surface treatment on the microshear bond strength (μsbs) of zirconia-based ceramic. Thirty-five zirconia disks were assigned to five groups according to the following treatments: Control (CO), glass and silane were not applied to the zirconia surface; G1, air blasted with 100μm glass beads + glaze + silane; G2, a gel containing 15% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; G3, a gel containing 25% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane; and G4, a gel containing 50% (by weight) glass beads applied to the ceramic surface + glaze + silane. The specimens were built up using RelyX ARC ® , according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and inserted in an elastomeric mold with an inner diameter of 0.8 mm. The μsbs test was performed using a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05) were applied to the bond strength values (in MPa). CO (15.6 ± 4.1) showed the lowest μsbs value. There were no statistical differences between the G1 (24.9 ± 7.4), G2 (24.9 ± 2.3), G3 (35.0 ± 10.3) and G4 (35.3 ± 6.0) experimental groups. Those groups submitted to surface treatments with higher concentrations of glass showed a lower frequency of adhesive failures. In conclusion, the glass application improved the interaction between the ceramic and the luting cement.

show abstract

“…Some authors [15][16][17] reported that a combination of airborne particle abrasion with Al 2 O 3 and etching with HF acid yielded higher bond strength values to silica-based ceramics (feldspathic, Empress I, lithium disilicate-based ceramics), and others [18,19] reported that high-strength ceramics (alumina, zirconia ceramics) treated with a silica-coating technique yielded the highest bond strength values to a composite resin. In this study feldspathic porcelain was used for repairing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

hear Bond Strength of Three Porcelain Repair Systems on Porcelain in Dry and Aged Conditions

Subasi¹,

İnan²

2012

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study compared the durability of bond strength of a resin composite to feldspathic ceramic by using three porcelain repair systems. Results:The characteristic bond strength values (σ 0 ) of repair systems in dry conditions were 5.823, 6.512 and 6,867 MPa and after aging conditions these were 4.112, 3.935 and 4.210 MPa for CO, CL and UL, respectively. Wald test results revealed that there were significant differences among groups in characteristic bond strength (σ 0 ) (p<0.001). Conclusion:Thermal cycling had a significant effect on the bond strength of three repair kits and bond strength results decreased after thermal cycling.

show abstract

The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials

Cited by 148 publications

References 11 publications

The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of a Resin Luting Agent and Four All-ceramic Systems

The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Micro-shear Bond Strength of a Resin Luting Agent and Four All-ceramic Systems

Improving adhesion between luting cement and zirconia-based ceramic with an alternative surface treatment

hear Bond Strength of Three Porcelain Repair Systems on Porcelain in Dry and Aged Conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About