2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of chelating agents on clays in geothermal reservoir formations: Implications to reservoir acid stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of such networks requires either specific hydraulic stimulation procedures or different stimulation techniques. With a growing number of available chemical stimulation techniques for geothermal reservoirs, our results encourage further research [47][48][49][50] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The generation of such networks requires either specific hydraulic stimulation procedures or different stimulation techniques. With a growing number of available chemical stimulation techniques for geothermal reservoirs, our results encourage further research [47][48][49][50] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…When evaluating the literature that was found on retardation mechanisms, it is interesting to see that deeper penetration is rarely the goal of their application. Sometimes retardation is necessary for high-temperature application (e.g., Samouei et al 2022), most often deeper penetration is more of a side effect and the goal is the safe application of the acids in reservoirs containing clay (e.g., Madirisha et al 2022) or more even dissolution patterns (e.g., Mella et al 2006). Thus, the implications of retarded dissolution and possibilities of deeper acid penetration into the reservoir formation are often going unnoticed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chelating agents that are applied in the geothermal context are nitrilo-triacetic acid NTA (Mella et al 2006;Rose et al 2007;Portier et al 2009), sulfophthalic acid SPA (Zemach et al 2013), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EDTA (Mella et al 2006;Cobos and Søgaard 2022), hydroxyethylenediaminetetraacetic acid HEDTA (Salalá et al 2021), different aminopolycarboxylic acids called BCA (Madirisha et al 2022), N, N-bis(carboxymethyl)-l-glutamic acid GLDA (Salalá et al 2021;Watanabe et al 2021;Salalá et al 2023;Takahashi et al 2023;Salalá et al 2024) and citric acid (Cobos and Søgaard 2021;Grifka et al 2023). Only NTA and SPA were applied in the field and SPA only in combination with a hydraulic stimulation (Zemach et al 2013).…”
Section: Change In the Chemical Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GLDA seems to be an ideal chelating agent for its biodegradability and power over a wide pH range. Their contribution to clay dissolution, in comparison with EDTA and N-(2-hydroxyethyl) ethylenediamine-N,N ,N -triacetic acid (HEDTA), has been the object of recent studies [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%