The Influence of Cloud and Surface Properties on the Arctic Ocean Shortwave Radiation Budget in Coupled Models*

Abstract

The impact of Arctic sea ice concentrations, surface albedo, cloud fraction, and cloud ice and liquid water paths on the surface shortwave (SW) radiation budget is analyzed in the twentieth-century simulations of three coupled models participating in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. The models are the Goddard Institute for Space Studies Model E-R (GISS-ER), the Met Office Third Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere GCM (UKMO HadCM3), and the National Center for Atmosphere Research Community Climate System Model, version 3 (NCAR CCSM3). In agreement with observations, the models all have high Arctic mean cloud fractions in summer; however, large differences are found in the cloud ice and liquid water contents. The simulated Arctic clouds of CCSM3 have the highest liquid water content, greatly exceeding the values observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) campaign. Both GISS-ER and HadCM3 lack liquid water and have excessive ice amounts in Arctic clouds compared to SHEBA observations. In CCSM3, the high surface albedo and strong cloud SW radiative forcing both significantly decrease the amount of SW radiation absorbed by the Arctic Ocean surface during the summer. In the GISS-ER and HadCM3 models, the surface and cloud effects compensate one another: GISS-ER has both a higher summer surface albedo and a larger surface incoming SW flux when compared to HadCM3. Because of the differences in the models' cloud and surface properties, the Arctic Ocean surface gains about 20% and 40% more solar energy during the melt period in the GISS-ER and HadCM3 models, respectively, compared to CCSM3.In twenty-first-century climate runs, discrepancies in the surface net SW flux partly explain the range in the models' sea ice area changes. Substantial decrease in sea ice area simulated during the twenty-first century in CCSM3 is associated with a large drop in surface albedo that is only partly compensated by increased cloud SW forcing. In this model, an initially high cloud liquid water content reduces the effect of the increase in cloud fraction and cloud liquid water on the cloud optical thickness, limiting the ability of clouds to compensate for the large surface albedo decrease. In HadCM3 and GISS-ER, the compensation of the surface albedo and cloud SW forcing results in negligible changes in the net SW flux and is one of the factors explaining moderate future sea ice area trends. Thus, model representations of cloud properties for today's climate determine the ability of clouds to compensate for the effect of surface albedo decrease on the future shortwave radiative budget of the Arctic Ocean and, as a consequence, the sea ice mass balance. * Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Contribution Number 7120. ϩ Current affiliation:

Impact of the Assimilation of Sea Ice Concentration Data on an Atmosphere-Ocean-Sea Ice Coupled Simulation of the Arctic Ocean Climate

“…Besides, an improvement to cloud modeling in the Arctic Ocean is a key requirement (e.g., Gorodetskaya et al 2008), whereas model bias of the Pacific water signal is expected to be removed by resolving the baroclinic eddies (Watanabe and Hasumi 2009). In addition, our results suggest that the use of more realistic sea ice models with non-zero heat capacity would enhance the improvement introduced by the assimilation.…”

An improved algorithm for polar cloud-base detection by ceilometer over the ice sheets

“…correctly projecting the polar climate, which is among others due to uncertainties in cloud parameterisations of macro-and microphysical properties Ettema et al, 2010;Gorodetskaya et al, 2008) and feedback mechanisms (Dufresne and Bony, 2008).…”

Improving satellite-retrieved surface radiative fluxes in polar regions using a smart sampling approach

“…Clouds are one of the dominant atmospheric features that interact with radiation in polar regions (Bintanja and Van Den Broeke, 1996;Curry et al, 2000;Gorodetskaya et al, 2008;Kay et al, 2008;Bromwich et al, 2012;Van Tricht et al, 2014;Miller et al, 2015), and were for instance shown to be responsible for a cloud radiative effect of 29.5 W m −2 over the Greenland ice sheet (Van Tricht et al, 2016). For the retrieval of a reliable SEB by satellite remote sensing, it is therefore of paramount importance to include proper cloud observations in the radiative transfer calculations, and the radiometers that retrieve radiative fluxes from space do not provide this information themselves.…”