2019
DOI: 10.2298/tsci19s4345k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of compaction and saturation on the compressibility of colliery waste

Abstract: Original scientific paper https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI19S4345KUsing colliery waste to produce building materials, especially in earthworks to build different types of road and railway embankments, or to fill cavities and open-pit mines, requires us to determine the value of the settlement and the ability of fly ash to reduce its volume about its usability for mentioned purposes. Economic benefits and the need to protect the environment are the main reasons for using fly ash as secondary raw material. The purpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, if gases can be released from the raw materials through the voids between particles in a larger fraction, they do not affect the mechanical strength as much as when they destroy the compactness of the material, leaving it with lower density and lower compressive and bending strength. The density of the FA was 2.288 ± 0.001 g cm −3 , whereas the MK density of 2.566 ± 0.001 g cm −3 was compliant with the specifications presented by the manufacturer (2.50- The density of the FA was 2.288 ± 0.001 g cm −3 , whereas the MK density of 2.566 ± 0.001 g cm −3 was compliant with the specifications presented by the manufacturer (2.50-2.80 g cm −3 ) and other authors [82,83].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…On the other hand, if gases can be released from the raw materials through the voids between particles in a larger fraction, they do not affect the mechanical strength as much as when they destroy the compactness of the material, leaving it with lower density and lower compressive and bending strength. The density of the FA was 2.288 ± 0.001 g cm −3 , whereas the MK density of 2.566 ± 0.001 g cm −3 was compliant with the specifications presented by the manufacturer (2.50- The density of the FA was 2.288 ± 0.001 g cm −3 , whereas the MK density of 2.566 ± 0.001 g cm −3 was compliant with the specifications presented by the manufacturer (2.50-2.80 g cm −3 ) and other authors [82,83].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%