1982
DOI: 10.1177/014920638200800107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Corporate Image and Specificity of Candidate Qualifications on Response to Recruitment Advertisement

Abstract: This paper reports the results of an experiment designed to examine the possible impact of (1) the corporate image of the advertiser and (2) the degree of specificity of the candidate qualifications, on the likelihood of reader response to a recruitment advertisement. The data indicated that the corporate image of the advertiser significantly influenced the likelihood of reader response, whereas the degree of specificity of the candidate qualifications did not significantly influence the likelihood of reader r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
107
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the results of studies by Rynes and Miller (1983) and Barber and Roehling (1993) showed that specific information regarding job characteristics influenced applicants' perceptions of organizational The Effects of Recruitment Message 4 attractiveness. Other research, however, has found either no or mixed effects regarding the role of ad specificity in the recruitment process (Belt & Paolillo, 1982;Mason & Belt, 1986). Given these mixed findings and the lack of a theoretical foundation in these studies, our understanding of recruitment processes may be enhanced to the extent that we can explain how and when detailed advertising will affect applicant intentions to apply to organizations.…”
Section: The Effects Of Recruitment Message Specificity On Applicant mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the results of studies by Rynes and Miller (1983) and Barber and Roehling (1993) showed that specific information regarding job characteristics influenced applicants' perceptions of organizational The Effects of Recruitment Message 4 attractiveness. Other research, however, has found either no or mixed effects regarding the role of ad specificity in the recruitment process (Belt & Paolillo, 1982;Mason & Belt, 1986). Given these mixed findings and the lack of a theoretical foundation in these studies, our understanding of recruitment processes may be enhanced to the extent that we can explain how and when detailed advertising will affect applicant intentions to apply to organizations.…”
Section: The Effects Of Recruitment Message Specificity On Applicant mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several authors have suggested that decisions to apply to an organization are often heavily reliant upon the general impressions of attractiveness that applicants hold about organizations (e.g., Belt & Paolillo, 1982;Rynes, 1991). Specifically, because of the small amount of information that is available to applicants early in the job choice process, applicants tend to base their initial application decisions on their perceptions and attitudes about organizations (Rynes, 1991).…”
Section: Recruitment Advertisement Specificity and Application Intentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study has strongly influenced the significance of information to be provided and word of mouth transmission by the companies (Cable et al, 2000). Company reputation has a strong impact in the minds of university students for their prospective employer which indicated that one major determinant of an organizations ability to recruit fresh graduates is organizational reputation, referring to the status of a firm's name relative to competing firms (Belt and Paolillo, 1982;Gatewood et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing well-built relations with fresh graduate masses provides the company an exclusive means to profile them as future employers and better augment their corporation likeness. "Research has indicated that one major determinant of an organizations ability to recruit fresh graduates is organizational reputation (Cable and Turban, 2003), referring to the status of a firm's name relative to competing firms" (Belt and Paolillo, 1982;Gatewood et al, 1993). We have taken reputation as comparable to a trademark and have taken employer brand equity in this regard.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rynes (1989) suggested that general impression of organizational attractiveness that she phrases as corporate image (or reputation in this research) is an important factor of job choice decision. Gatewood, Gowan, & Lautenschlager (1993); Fombrun & Shanley (1990); Belt & Paolillo (1982) and others indicated that corporate reputation is a major component of job choice decisions. This research is not about rating corporate image or reputation rather it intends to identify job attributes that affect job choice.…”
Section: Company Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%