2018
DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Culture on Attitudes Towards Humanoid and Animal‐like Robots: An Integrative Review

Abstract: Purpose:The aim of the present review is to explore the influence of culture on attitudes towards humanoid and animal-like robots. Design: An integrative review of current evidence. Methods: Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched from 2000 to 2017. A total of 22 articles met the inclusion criteria and were retrieved and analyzed. Findings: Culture influences attitudes and preferences towards robots, but due to the limitations of the reviewed studies, concrete conclusions cannot be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All five of the studies used questionnaires, three used solely questionnaires, [5,6,10] one used focus groups and question-naires, [11] and one used individual user tests and questionnaires. [4] Out of the 23 publications included in this review, there were five secondary studies of differing types, including two literature reviews, [12,13] one integrative review, [14] one rapid evidence review, [15] and one systematic review. [16] The ten primary and secondary studies outlined in Appendix 1 were conducted in many different countries, indicating an interest in robots for care of the elderly that spans a large part of the globe.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All five of the studies used questionnaires, three used solely questionnaires, [5,6,10] one used focus groups and question-naires, [11] and one used individual user tests and questionnaires. [4] Out of the 23 publications included in this review, there were five secondary studies of differing types, including two literature reviews, [12,13] one integrative review, [14] one rapid evidence review, [15] and one systematic review. [16] The ten primary and secondary studies outlined in Appendix 1 were conducted in many different countries, indicating an interest in robots for care of the elderly that spans a large part of the globe.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an infographic by the European Commission [29] reported that while the majority of EU and Danish citizens had positive views of robots and thought they could be useful in different areas of healthcare, the majority thought they should not be used for care of the elderly, children or the disabled. The last study conducted by Papadopoulos & Koulouglioti [14] looked at cultural backgrounds related to attitudes towards robots but could not conclude with certainty which specific countries feel more positively or negatively towards robots due to limitations within studies included in their review.…”
Section: Perceptions and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction and adoption of a home healthcare robot can be studied from different points of view [ 15 ]. The theoretical starting points of the present study are based on discussions about attitudes towards robots [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Consistent with previous studies, this study assumes that workers’ attitudes play a key role in the success of robot deployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first dimension relates to attitudes towards situations of interaction with robots (NARS1), the second to attitudes towards the social influence of robots (NARS2), and the third dimension to attitudes towards the emotions in interaction with robots (NARS3). Studies have revealed that there are cultural differences in attitudes towards robots [ 24 ]. For example, the Japanese prefer more human-like robots than Europeans [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%