The influence of customized abutments and custom metal abutments on the presence of the interproximal papilla at implants inserted in single‐unit gaps: a 1‐year prospective clinical study

Borges, Tiago; Lima, Tiago Alencar de; Carvalho, Ágata; Dourado, Catarina; Carvalho, Vasco

doi:10.1111/clr.12257

Cited by 26 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…None of the selected studies were randomized controlled clinical trials. Three studies were retrospective (Choquet, Hermans, Adriaenssens, Daelemans, Tarnow, & Malevez, ; Cosyn, Sabzevar, & De Bruyn, ; Perez, Segalla, Marcantonio Jr, Lauris, Ribeiro, & Ferreira, ), and six studies were prospective (Borges, Lima, Carvalho, Dourado, & Carvalho, ; Degidi, Nardi, & Piattelli, ; Henriksson & Jemt, ; Lops, Romeo, Chiapasco, Procopio, & Oteri, ; Lops, Mosca, Müller, Rossi, Rozza, & Romeo, ; Malchiodi, Cucchi, Ghensi, & Nocini, ), while three papers described data collected from cross‐sectional clinical studies (Chang & Wennström, ; Nisapakultorn, Suphanantachat, Silkosessak, & Rattanamongkolgul, ; Palmer, Farkondeh, Palmer, & Wilson, ). Ten studies were conducted in a university (Borges et al., ; Chang & Wennström, ; Choquet et al., ; Cosyn et al., ; Henriksson & Jemt, ; Lops et al., , ; Malchiodi et al., ; Nisapakultorn et al., ; Perez et al., ) one in private practice (Degidi et al., ) and one in both of the settings (Palmer et al., ) (Table ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies excluded smoking patients (Degidi et al., ; Lops et al., ), while other two studies excluded smokers >10 (Lops et al., ) and >20 (Malchiodi et al., ) cigarettes per day. Only one study (Choquet et al., ) included two smokers (>20 cig./day), whereas the remaining seven studies did not report on patients’ smoking habit (Borges et al., ; Chang & Wennström, ; Cosyn et al., ; Henriksson & Jemt, ; Nisapakultorn et al., ; Palmer et al., ; Perez et al., ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nine of 12 studies did not report on patients’ periodontal status (Chang & Wennström, ; Choquet et al., ; Cosyn et al., ; Henriksson & Jemt, ; Lops et al., ; Malchiodi et al., ; Nisapakultorn et al., ; Palmer et al., ; Perez et al., ), while three studies excluded patients with a history of periodontitis (Borges et al., ; Degidi et al., ; Lops et al., ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Papilla height in relation to the distance between bone crest and interproximal contact point at single‐tooth implants: A systematic review

Roccuzzo

Roccuzzo²,

Ramanuskaite

2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is limited evidence that the vertical distance from the base of the interproximal contact point to the crestal bone level seems to affect the interproximal papilla height; that is, the lower is the distance the higher is the percentage of papilla fill. Complete embrasure fill between an implant restoration and the adjacent tooth seems to be correlated with the integrity of the periodontal ligament of the tooth. To reduce the risk of aesthetic failures, interproximal probing on the adjacent teeth should be encouraged before implant placement.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Papilla height in relation to the distance between bone crest and interproximal contact point at single‐tooth implants: A systematic review

Roccuzzo

Roccuzzo²,

Ramanuskaite

2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The liability of excess cement remainder in the periodontal area and its consequences has been discussed as an adverse outcome, in case with abutment margin depths and immediate cemented restoration (12), which may be prevented with abutment that allow screw-retained crowns (6). Another disadvantage associated with definitive abutment after surgery is the difficulty of selecting the appropriate definitive standard abutment immediately after implant insertion, concerned to high soft tissue and wall bone variance (12) that can be prevented by using customized abutments (13).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One Abutment at One Time Concept for Platform-Switched Morse Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Santos¹,

Santos

Martins-Filho

et al. 2018

Braz. Dent. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the peri-implant vertical bone loss of immediate loading of implant crowns using the one abutment at one time (AOT) protocol and implants with abutment removal (AR). This systematic review with meta-analysis was reported according to the PRISMA statement, with guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. A total of 103 publications were identified in the PubMed database and reference lists of examined articles. After the screening of titles and abstracts, the eligibility of eight full-text articles was assessed. Five studies published between 2010 and 2015 were included in the meta-analysis. There was less peri-implant vertical bone loss at implants using an AOT protocol than at implants using AR protocol (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.13; p<0.0001; random-effects model). In conclusion, the use of the AOT protocol with platform-switched Morse implants results in less bone loss than do AR procedures, but this effect may not be clinically relevant. The preservation of marginal bone level achieved with the AOT protocol may not enhance the aesthetics. These results should be interpreted with caution.

show abstract

“…However, the customized abutments seem to provide better results than angled abutments for ideal crown contours and peri-implant soft tissue support [22]. Among the variety of custom abutments that can be satisfactorily utilized for implant-retained prostheses, the UCLA castable type is one of the most popular.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Importance of the Appropriate Meso-Structure for the Success and Retention of Overdentures – Case Series

2016

J Oral Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral Biologyhousing. Several different methods have been suggested to correct misangulated implant placements during the prosthetic phases of treatment. The most common method is the use of angulated or custom abutments, which allows positional correction. (Allows the correction of 40º of divergence) However, limitation still exists to achieve the ideal parallelism.The use of overdentures with meso-structures (ODMS) is one option for solving this problem. The meso-structure is fabricated by precision milling of casted frameworks [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Paralleled Locator attachments can be casted, screwed or laser-welded on the mesostructure in a more favorable position. In 2012, Kim et al. reported that implant overdenture using a locator bar system fabricated with the drill and tapping technique provided stability, support, and retention to dentures for fully edentulous patients [11]. However, considering the wide range of different intraoral locations of milled bars, there is a lack of information regarding the evaluation of meso- Avens Publishing Group Inviting Innovations Avens Publishing Group Inviting InnovationsKeywords: Overdenture; Meso-structure; Implant angulation; Stability AbstractLack of retention and stability is one of the most challenging problems in wearing conventional dentures due to the atrophy of the alveolar ridge. In addition, pain or discomfort can be frequently present with a poor load-bearing capacity of the tissues. The treatment of choice, among several options for edentulous patients is the implant-supported overdenture prosthesis. Locators have been the most popular method used as an unsplinted anchorage system. Poorly angled or unfavorably positioned implants cause lack of parallelism, resulting in compromised esthetics, phonetics, and function. The use of overdentures with meso-structures and paralleled Locator attachments is one option for solving this problem. The purpose of this report was to present a case series, and document a step-by-step procedure to fabricate overdentures with meso-structures and to discuss the indications, contraindications, advantages and disadvantages of meso-structures.

show abstract

The influence of customized abutments and custom metal abutments on the presence of the interproximal papilla at implants inserted in single‐unit gaps: a 1‐year prospective clinical study

Abstract: The restoration of single-implants using computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing abutments appears to help maintaining a regular papillary filling although the variations of the implant positioning or the restoration/teeth relation.

Cited by 26 publications

References 26 publications

Papilla height in relation to the distance between bone crest and interproximal contact point at single‐tooth implants: A systematic review

Papilla height in relation to the distance between bone crest and interproximal contact point at single‐tooth implants: A systematic review

One Abutment at One Time Concept for Platform-Switched Morse Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Importance of the Appropriate Meso-Structure for the Success and Retention of Overdentures – Case Series

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About