Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management 2012
DOI: 10.5772/35484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Decisional Autonomy on Performance and Strategic Choices - The Case of Subcontracting SMEs in Logging Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common performance measures are of a financial nature, such as revenues, costs and equity ratio. One notable exception was described by St-Jean and LeBel (2012), who identified eleven performance indicators in the literature, which they applied to harvesting contractors: increases in revenues, number of employees, profit margin, improvements in production techniques, use of new technology, quality and variety of services, client satisfaction, personnel recruitment and retention, investment in the community and respect for the environment and sustainable development. They did not, however, seek empirical support for these indicators, and did not specify performance further.…”
Section: Performance Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most common performance measures are of a financial nature, such as revenues, costs and equity ratio. One notable exception was described by St-Jean and LeBel (2012), who identified eleven performance indicators in the literature, which they applied to harvesting contractors: increases in revenues, number of employees, profit margin, improvements in production techniques, use of new technology, quality and variety of services, client satisfaction, personnel recruitment and retention, investment in the community and respect for the environment and sustainable development. They did not, however, seek empirical support for these indicators, and did not specify performance further.…”
Section: Performance Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the forest industry, the outsourcing of forest operations has become common practice all over the world (e.g., [4]). Consequently, many forest companies rely on the services of small or medium-sized harvesting contractors (e.g., [5,6]). Despite the long tradition in the forest industry of working with contracted harvesting resources, large variations in contractor performance have been found regarding, for instance, contractor profitability (e.g., [7][8][9][10]), technical efficiency [11][12][13], and various aspects of the service delivered to the customer [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forestry, the customer has a large impact on how harvesting services are purchased (and paid for), as well as the business models that companies apply (Benjaminsson et al 2019). As entrepreneurs should maintain a certain independence from their customers, this business relationship structure can hinder contractors' entrepreneurial behaviors, such as taking responsibility for the business and finding innovative solutions for further business development (St-Jean and LeBel 2012). Historically, improvement and development efforts in forestry have mainly been driven by the customers, for example, large forest companies, who hold significant power in dictating the business and operational practices of harvesting services .…”
Section: Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%