2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of detector size relative to field size in small-field photon-beam dosimetry using synthetic diamond crystals as sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible, for example, to understand if the crystal structure is pure (peak at 1,332.8 cm -1 ) or if there are other contributions due to vacancies that could act as a trapping center for charges (other peaks). For the pcCVD substrate, the level of defects could also depend on the large concentration of grain boundaries [46][47][48][49]. This analysis is sometimes complemented by optical spectrophotometry or FTIR methods to detect substitutional defects in the diamond lattice.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible, for example, to understand if the crystal structure is pure (peak at 1,332.8 cm -1 ) or if there are other contributions due to vacancies that could act as a trapping center for charges (other peaks). For the pcCVD substrate, the level of defects could also depend on the large concentration of grain boundaries [46][47][48][49]. This analysis is sometimes complemented by optical spectrophotometry or FTIR methods to detect substitutional defects in the diamond lattice.…”
Section: Characterization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these conditions lateral charged particle equilibrium is lost because the size of the field becomes small compared to the range of the dose depositing electrons. Small fields have also a very large percentage of the field made up by penumbra; if the detector is larger than 1/4th of the lateral field dimension, the detector size is large compared to the beam dimensions making volume averaging within the detector problematic [8]. Due to these physical conditions small field dosimetry requires different correction factors related to different characteristics of the detector like the density of the sensitive volume, the presence of extra components like metal electrodes and the volume averaging [27][28][29].…”
Section: Small Field Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In diamond material, defects and impurities are present and they strongly influence the lifetime of charge carriers, generating a slow dynamic response and affecting the reproducibility and time stability [7]. In the last decade most of these limitations have been overcome but the dimensions of the detector's sensitive volume and the electrode geometry are still crucial to the solution of the dosimetric issues observed in small photon beams with diamond detectors [8,9]. Recently a new technology to create graphitic paths in the diamond bulk has emerged [10][11][12][13] allowing to create 3-dimensional structures like the 3-D silicon detectors [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water phantom and commercial ionization chambers were used for calibration and comparison with commercial dosimeters [155][156][157][158]. Other than x-ray and electron beams [159] such Schottky diode detectors have also been tested for small field [160] photon beams in clinical radiation therapy ( Figure 8IV) [161]. Moreover the same PIM structure had been irradiated with 20nm to 100nm UV and EUV radiation with very good photoconductivity, without undesirable memory effect, good response time and high signal to noise ratios [162].…”
Section: Scd Detectors (Figure 9)mentioning
confidence: 99%