1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x00006994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Dietary Protein Level upon the Response of Mice Infected with Schistosoma mansoni to Treatment with Niridazole (Ambilhar)

Abstract: 1. The influence of diets having different protein values on the schistosomicidal effect of Ambilhar has been investigated in mice.2. Mice placed on these diets throughout the period of infection and then treated, reached differently. Low protein diets produced fewer and smaller worms which were more susceptible to the drug.3. Mice maintained on an adequate diet were shifted to diets of varying protein values a few days before treatment. In these, drug treatment was more satisfactory in animals fed the high pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embryogenesis was retarded in female worms and the appearance of microfilariae in the peripheral blood was delayed in protein-deficient cotton rats; the subsequent development of the microfilaraemia was also slower. These observations with filarial worms are similar to those found with schistosomes -where there is a reduced egg production by parasites from protein deficient animals (De Witt, 1957;De Meillon & Paterson, 1958;Knauft & Warren, 1969;Fadl, 1971;Akpom & Warren, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Embryogenesis was retarded in female worms and the appearance of microfilariae in the peripheral blood was delayed in protein-deficient cotton rats; the subsequent development of the microfilaraemia was also slower. These observations with filarial worms are similar to those found with schistosomes -where there is a reduced egg production by parasites from protein deficient animals (De Witt, 1957;De Meillon & Paterson, 1958;Knauft & Warren, 1969;Fadl, 1971;Akpom & Warren, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%