2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27963-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Different Cross-Section Shapes of Train Body on Aerodynamic Performance

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, the influence of different cross-section shapes of train body on aerodynamic performance has been investigated by numerical simulations. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used with the second-order finite volume method with SST k-omega turbulence model. The results indicate that the aerodynamic performance is strongly affected by different cross-section shapes of train body, such as cross-sectional area, width-to-height ratio of crosssection, cross-section with straight or curved s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k-omega turbulence model can eliminate the adverse free flow issues of the Wilcox model, and the SST method is further developed by introducing an upper limit for the turbulent shear stress in boundary layers to avoid overpredicting the shear stress at the train surface. 30,31 The relevant control equations are solved using the CFD software STAR-CCM+ based on the finite volume method (FVM). In this work, the SIMPLE pressure-velocity coupling method is adopted.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k-omega turbulence model can eliminate the adverse free flow issues of the Wilcox model, and the SST method is further developed by introducing an upper limit for the turbulent shear stress in boundary layers to avoid overpredicting the shear stress at the train surface. 30,31 The relevant control equations are solved using the CFD software STAR-CCM+ based on the finite volume method (FVM). In this work, the SIMPLE pressure-velocity coupling method is adopted.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%