2003
DOI: 10.1080/00224540309598454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Diversity Context on White Men's and Racial Minorities' Reactions to Disproportionate Group Harm

Abstract: The author examined the influence of organizational diversity management on White men's and racial minorities' perceptions of fairness when members of their identity group were disproportionately harmed in a layoff. Using a scenario design, the author studied the reactions of 284 White male and racial minority layoff survivors under 2 different diversity contexts. White men saw the layoff as less fair to their group when other White men were laid off disproportionately in an active-diversity context versus an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This positive reaction to diversity reputation among majority group members runs counter to the suggestion that nonminorities may react negatively to diversity efforts because these programs benefit other groups but do not benefit them (Mollica, 2003 firm build a positive reputation, as this appears to make the firm more attractive, even to those who will not directly benefit from those efforts. The reasons why diversity reputation might have influenced job pursuit intentions in this sample are addressed in the sections that follow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This positive reaction to diversity reputation among majority group members runs counter to the suggestion that nonminorities may react negatively to diversity efforts because these programs benefit other groups but do not benefit them (Mollica, 2003 firm build a positive reputation, as this appears to make the firm more attractive, even to those who will not directly benefit from those efforts. The reasons why diversity reputation might have influenced job pursuit intentions in this sample are addressed in the sections that follow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Another result of confronting historically advantaged groups with their bias is that it can incite their anger, contempt or feelings of persecution (Driscoll, Pendry, & Field, 2006; Mollica, 2003), leading to backlash against diversity programmes to the detriment of intergroup relations (D'Souza, 1997; Von Bergen, Soper, & Foster, 2002). For example, if individuals who identify highly with their ‘White’ identity feel that it is being sullied or wrongly accused or attacked, they are unlikely to feel very guilty (Doosje, Branscombe, Spears, & Manstead, 1998).…”
Section: How Social Psychological Theory Can Help: Programme Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bunlardan bazıları şöyle sıralanabilir: En iyi yetenekleri örgüte çekme ve örgüt içinde tutma (Laçinler, 1997;McMahan vd., 1998, s. 198;Gilbert ve Ivancevich, 2001;Brannan ve Priola, 2012;Mor Barak, 2014); örgütün rekabet gücünü artırma (Redding, 1982;Thomas ve Ely, 1999;Brodbeck vd., 2011); hızlı bireysel ve örgütsel öğrenme, yüksek düzeyde yaratıcılık ve yenileşme (Gentile, 1994;Speechley ve Wheatley, 2001;Richard vd., 2003;Schermerhon vd., 2000;Sarayönlü, 2003;Avery ve McKay, 2010); yüksek moral ve artan işdoyumu (Gilbert ve Stead, 1999;Von Bergen vd., 2000;Maldonado, Dreachslin, Dansky, Souza ve Gatto, 2002;Guillaume vd., 2014); sorunlara alternatif çözümler üretme ve örgütsel esneklik (Nemeth, 1986;Cox, 1992;Walton, 1994;Richard, 2000;Brown vd., 2012); çevresel değişime daha hızlı tepki gösterme ve daha yüksek düzeyde uyum sağlama yeteneği kazanma (Cox ve Blake, 1991;Romano, 1995;Collins, 1996;McMahan vd., 1998;Clarge, Cao ve Lahenay, 2003); halkla iyi ilişkiler geliştirme ve olumlu örgütsel imaj (Speechley ve Wheatley, 2001); sinerji ve örgütsel etkililik (Adler, 1991;Muter, 1999;Thomas ve Ely, 1999;Schermerhon vd., 2000;Mollica, 2003;Avery ve McKay, 2010). Farklı insanlar; farklı kültürleri, kişilik özelliklerini ve yeteneklerini de okula taşırlar.…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçunclassified
“…Bunların bilinmesi önemli görülmektedir. Bu konuda yurtdışında çok sayıda araştırma yapılmasına karşın (Gentile, 1994;McMahan vd., 1998;Schermerhon, Hunt ve Osborn, 2000;Speechley ve Wheatley, 2001;Gilbert ve Ivancevich, 2001;Ashkanasy, Hartel ve Daus, 2002;Richard, McMillian, Chandwick ve Dwyer, 2003;Mollica, 2003;van Knippenberg ve Schippers, 2007;McKay, Avery ve Morris, 2008;Avery ve McKay, 2010;Brodbeck, Guillaume ve Lee, 2011;Brannan ve Priola, 2012;Guillaume vd., 2014;Mor Barak, 2014), bu konunun Türkiye'de ve özellikle eğitim örgütlerinde yeterince araştırılmadığı söylenebilir. Bu bağlamda yönetici ve öğretmen görüşlerine göre Türkiye'deki liselerde farklılıkların nasıl algılandığı ve yönetsel politika ve uygulamalarda ne ölçüde dikkate alındığı araştırmanın temel problemini oluşturmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified