2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of electron collisions on non-LTE Li line formation in stellar atmospheres

Abstract: The influence of the uncertainties in the rate coefficient data for electron-impact excitation and ionization on non-LTE Li line formation in cool stellar atmospheres is investigated. We examine the electron collision data used in previous non-LTE calculations and compare them to recent calculations that use convergent close-coupling (CCC) techniques and to our own calculations using the R-matrix with the pseudostates (RMPS) method. We find excellent agreement between rate coefficients from the CCC and RMPS ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level energies and the spontaneous radiative decay rate are taken from Klevas et al (2016). We only consider electron impact as the collisional excitation process and its rate coefficients are taken from Osorio et al (2011). The cooling rate including the line self-absorption β esc Λ Li,thin = n(Li)n(e)L Li /ρ (erg g −1 s −1 ) is calculated for given sets of the temperature T, the electron number density n(e) and the lithium column density N(Li).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level energies and the spontaneous radiative decay rate are taken from Klevas et al (2016). We only consider electron impact as the collisional excitation process and its rate coefficients are taken from Osorio et al (2011). The cooling rate including the line self-absorption β esc Λ Li,thin = n(Li)n(e)L Li /ρ (erg g −1 s −1 ) is calculated for given sets of the temperature T, the electron number density n(e) and the lithium column density N(Li).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lithium, the dominant electron collisional rates come from Park (1971). While the R-matrix calculations performed by Osorio et al (2011) differed significantly, the dominant transitions happen to agree sufficiently well that the effects on the resonance line strength are smaller than 0.01 dex.…”
Section: Lithium and Sodiummentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Before calculating the RM data, the data of Park (1971) were used in non-LTE modelling, and these data typically agree to within 80% of the RM data, significantly better than the vR or IP methods. Thus, the new RM data for electron collisions did not have a strong effect on non-LTE modelling, since the existing data were relatively good; see Osorio et al (2011) for Li, Lind et al (2011) for Na. Data for hydrogen collision processes, including charge transfer, have been calculated for Li by Barklem et al (2003), and for Na by Barklem et al (2010), and used in non-LTE studies by Barklem et al and Lind et al (2009) in the case of Li and Lind et al (2011) for Na.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RM calculations have been performed for excitation of low-lying levels of Li and Na by electron collisions by Osorio et al (2011) and Gao et al (2010), respectively. Before calculating the RM data, the data of Park (1971) were used in non-LTE modelling, and these data typically agree to within 80% of the RM data, significantly better than the vR or IP methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%