2018
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of endorectal filling on rectal cancer staging with MRI

Abstract: EF-MRI did not lead to an improved tumour staging and it has the potential to influence the distance to a key anatomical landmark. EF-MRI is therefore not recommended in primary staging rectal cancer. Advances in knowledge: EF-MRI may not be used as an additional tool to stage rectal cancer patients, as it does not seem to facilitate in locoregionally staging the disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large discrepancy was seen between the number of lymph nodes detected. Differences in numbers of detected mesorectal lymph nodes may be reader-dependent based on the experience of the radiologist or on the time that was invested in lymph node evaluation [32]. The evaluation time for each of the two MRI readers was not measured, but the time spent could partly account for the difference.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large discrepancy was seen between the number of lymph nodes detected. Differences in numbers of detected mesorectal lymph nodes may be reader-dependent based on the experience of the radiologist or on the time that was invested in lymph node evaluation [32]. The evaluation time for each of the two MRI readers was not measured, but the time spent could partly account for the difference.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies ( 13 16 ) have reported filling the rectum for better visualization of lesions and evaluation of tumor penetration on MRI. In contrast, other studies ( 37 39 ) advised against distending the rectum due to possible undesirable effects on the distance between the rectal lesion and MRF. Therefore, the mesorectal area or volume was not included in this study due to instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a controversy about the benefits of rectal ultrasound filling in the diagnostic setting. This is especially due to the possibility that the rectal distention caused by the ultrasound filling might artificially shorten the distance of the tumor to the mesorectal fascia or increase the distance of the tumor from the dentate line (Slater, Halligan et al 2006, Stijns, Scheenen et al 2018. Moreover, the parts of the tumor that define risk feature such as infiltration depth or extramural venous invasion are extramural and not affected by higher contrast in the rectum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%