2018
DOI: 10.1177/0309364617704801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of environment

Abstract: Background:Prostheses are used to varying degrees; however, little is known about how environmental aspects influence this use.Objectives:To describe users’ experiences of how environmental factors influence their use of a myoelectric arm prosthesis.Study design:Qualitative and descriptive.Methods:A total of 13 patients previously provided with a myoelectric prosthetic hand participated. Their age, sex, deficiency level, etiology, current prosthesis use, and experience varied. Semi-structured interviews were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prosthesis use is greatly affected by the environment, and qualitative research implies that the experience from environmental influence differs depending on how much the MEP is used; daily prosthesis users experience more support and less environmental barriers [2]. To strengthen this conclusion and also to investigate if it is valid for other types of advanced assistive technology (AT), a further study based on quantitative methodology is needed.…”
Section: Environmental Barriers To Participation and Facilitators Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosthesis use is greatly affected by the environment, and qualitative research implies that the experience from environmental influence differs depending on how much the MEP is used; daily prosthesis users experience more support and less environmental barriers [2]. To strengthen this conclusion and also to investigate if it is valid for other types of advanced assistive technology (AT), a further study based on quantitative methodology is needed.…”
Section: Environmental Barriers To Participation and Facilitators Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceptability of assistive technology is dependent not only on its efficiency, but also on the reactions it elicits in people surrounding the user, as people with limb loss themselves have rated social outcomes as more important for assessing quality of life outcomes than their physical impairment [11,12]. Good social support has been identified as a predictor for not only the perceived quality of life, but also the functional outcome after amputation [13,14].…”
Section: Social Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychosocial adjustment is defined as an individual's response to events having a significant impact on their lives, which require adaptation. Influential factors on positive psychosocial adaptation have not been explored widely [20], despite the fact that it seems like this adaptation is one of the most powerful facilitators of later prosthesis use and a high quality of life [12,20,21]. There is, however, some evidence that factors such as an active coping style, as well as general (dispositional) optimism, a tendency for "downwards social comparison", as well as the feeling that one has some control over one's own situation, are all favourable indicators for good psychosocial adjustment [15,22].…”
Section: Psychosocial Adjustment Expectations and Personal Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on prosthetic limbs provides other models . But, as with the transplant literature, the experience of TJR ultimately diverges.…”
Section: Toward Models For Embodiment In Tjrmentioning
confidence: 99%