Recent Advances in Lichenology 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2181-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Environmental Factors on the Growth of Lichens in the Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is a consequence of these species having suffered, to some degree, a loss of larger thalli as a result of being covered by snow for longer periods. Snow kill appears to be an important process in Antarctica, as well as in alpine and arctic environments [38,39] and leads to rock surfaces being made available for new colonisation. The same process was suggested for the establishment of the crustose lichen Buellia frigida in the Dry Valleys, albeit at around 1000 and 4000 years ago [40].…”
Section: Short-term Growth Rate Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is a consequence of these species having suffered, to some degree, a loss of larger thalli as a result of being covered by snow for longer periods. Snow kill appears to be an important process in Antarctica, as well as in alpine and arctic environments [38,39] and leads to rock surfaces being made available for new colonisation. The same process was suggested for the establishment of the crustose lichen Buellia frigida in the Dry Valleys, albeit at around 1000 and 4000 years ago [40].…”
Section: Short-term Growth Rate Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major source of growth rate variation in mature lichen thalli is differential environmental effects (Armstrong ). Understanding these effects on lichen growth is important in lichenometry for two reasons.…”
Section: Environmental Growth Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichenometric dating has been used in geographic and geological sciences for about six decades (i.a. Beschel 1961, Armstrong 1976, 1978, 2002, 2015, Karlén 1973, Webber and Andrews 1973, Matthews 1974, Topham 1976, Armstrong and Smith 1987, Benedict 1991, Innes 1982, Bradwell 2009. However, some scientists question almost completely the lichenometric dating method (Osborn et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%