2010
DOI: 10.1134/s0006350910040196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of extremely weak alternating magnetic fields on the regeneration of planarians and the gravitropic response of plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study (48) supports the hypothesis that 'exposure to magnetic fields at mean intensities of 2-15 mT can induce chromosomal damage'. Apart from that, the hydrogen nuclear polarisation model (49) predicts a biological response for oscillating magnetic field strengths above 0.1 mT. The presence of a static magnetic field is required and biological effects can be expected for all frequencies below a few hundred hertz.…”
Section: Biological Effects and Icnirp Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study (48) supports the hypothesis that 'exposure to magnetic fields at mean intensities of 2-15 mT can induce chromosomal damage'. Apart from that, the hydrogen nuclear polarisation model (49) predicts a biological response for oscillating magnetic field strengths above 0.1 mT. The presence of a static magnetic field is required and biological effects can be expected for all frequencies below a few hundred hertz.…”
Section: Biological Effects and Icnirp Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies of EMF effects on plants [Tkalec et al, 2005[Tkalec et al, ,2007[Tkalec et al, ,2009Sharma et al, 2009] have been reported. In early studies seeds were exposed to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields or RF radiation in order to investigate biological effects [Bigu-Del-Blanco et al, 1977;Belova and Lednev, 2001;Belova et al, 2007;Tkalec et al, 2009;Shine et al, 2011], however, the results are inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most experiments devoted to the effect of weak combined alternating (AC) and static (DC) magnetic fields (MFs) on biosystems have been performed using fields with the amplitude of the AC component of tens of microteslas against the background of the static MF of comparable strength. However, there is substantial evidence indicating that very weak alternating MFs of the nanotesla range are also capable of inducing marked biological effects [Juutilainen et al, 1987;Berman et al, 1990;Liburdy et al, 1993;Novikov et al, 1996Novikov et al, , 2005Novikov et al, , 2008Persinger et al, 1999;Belova and Lednev, 2001;Blackman et al, 2001;Novikov, 2004;Bobkova et al, 2005;Belova et al, 2007]. It should be noted that in the majority of cases, the experiments with very weak AC MFs were conducted against the background of the geomagnetic field whose magnetic flux density is $50 mT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%