2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of familiarity and temperature on the huddling behavior of two mouse species with contrasting social systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3c-d). It should be noted that while sleep huddles have an obvious role in thermoregulation at low temperatures, they also involve social tolerance and are facilitated by familiarity 62,63 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c-d). It should be noted that while sleep huddles have an obvious role in thermoregulation at low temperatures, they also involve social tolerance and are facilitated by familiarity 62,63 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This and many other considerations made us wonder: How do wild mice respond to changes to external temperature and specifically lower temperature? In mice (70,(116)(117)(118)(119) and other species (120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125)(126)(127), huddling with other individuals is an effective way to reduce heat loss; it has indeed been considered "a public good with a private cost" (128). Behavioural studies have indeed shown that huddling in mice increases as the temperature lowers (117,129).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects may be seasonal; for instance, many species overwinter in communal dens or shelters for the express purpose of thermoregulation [e.g. reptiles (White & Lasiewski, 1971; Graves & Duvall, 1995; Shah et al ., 2003; Davis Rabosky et al ., 2012); mammals (Arnold, 1993; Ondrasek et al ., 2015; Groó et al ., 2018)]. In these cases, changes in the thermal environment, for example the onset of milder winter temperatures, could reduce the duration of aggregations or eliminate them altogether (Davis Rabosky et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Scaling Up Individual Responses: Social Evolution On Ecological Timescalesmentioning
confidence: 99%