“…The maximum differences in share of damage in the total area of the laminate are 0.6%, 0.44%, 4.64%, and 2.84% for strokes with energy of 5, 15, 30, and 45 J, respectively. At the same time, it can be seen that the damage analysis of HTCL with various metal content and number of interfaces correlates with the observations of curves representing energy changes over time, where a greater ability to absorb impact energy of HTCL with a lower MVF coefficient was recorded, precisely due to the increased share of composite destruction, especially at the metal composite phase boundary and/or the boundaries of composite layers arranged perpendicularly to each other [16,41].…”