2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of fluid–structure interaction on cloud cavitation about a stiff hydrofoil. Part 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental set-up and techniques used in this investigation are described in Parts I (Smith et al 2020a) and II (Smith et al 2020b). As such, this section only briefly summarizes the set-up and techniques for completeness.…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental set-up and techniques used in this investigation are described in Parts I (Smith et al 2020a) and II (Smith et al 2020b). As such, this section only briefly summarizes the set-up and techniques for completeness.…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed above, the frequency of Type II cavity shedding is a function of the cavity length. Deformable hydrofoils with nose-up bend-twist coupling showed an increased cavity length, which reduced the Type II cavity shedding frequency (Pearce et al 2017;Young et al 2018;Smith et al 2020b). Hence, the presence of ventilation or cavitation can lead to very different dynamic responses from fully wetted flow (Young et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cavities become susceptible to condensation shockwaves as the speed of sound reduces in bubble flows [6]. This mechanism tends to become more dominant at lower cavitation numbers [1,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%