2019
DOI: 10.1177/2378023119845252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Foreign-born Population on Immigrant and Native-born Students’ Academic Achievement

Abstract: With recent increases in international migration, some political and academic narratives argue for limiting migration because of possible negative effects on the host country. Among other outcomes, these groups argue that immigrant students have an impact on education, negatively affecting native-born students’ academic performance. The authors contextualize the relationship between immigrant status and academic achievement by considering a macro social setting: country-level foreign-born population. The autho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without FIML, the common default of listwise deletion in Model 1 (n = 113) excluded three OECD countries and 38 countries with populations of over one million, which is normal with the common criteria used for sample selection in the quantitative literature (see Appendix B). To be clear, in the social sciences, generally, the issue of missing data continues to be handled by way of listwise deletion or largely ignored, even in studies published in social science journals with an explicit focus on innovative empirical research [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without FIML, the common default of listwise deletion in Model 1 (n = 113) excluded three OECD countries and 38 countries with populations of over one million, which is normal with the common criteria used for sample selection in the quantitative literature (see Appendix B). To be clear, in the social sciences, generally, the issue of missing data continues to be handled by way of listwise deletion or largely ignored, even in studies published in social science journals with an explicit focus on innovative empirical research [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on immigrant peer effects is mixed and includes studies that find negative effects (e.g., Szulkin and Jonsson, 2007;Gould, Lavy and Paserman, 2009;Contini, 2013;Veerman, van de Werfhorst and Dronkers, 2013;Schneeweis, 2015;Bossavie, 2017;Ballatore, Fort and Ichino, 2018;Fletcher et al, 2019), zero effects (e.g., Bifulco, Fletcher and Ross, 2011;Schwartz and Stiefel, 2011;Geay, McNally and Telhaj, 2013;Ohinata and Van Ours, 2013;Conger, 2015;Brandén, Birkelund and Szulkin, 2018), and even positive effects (e.g., Silveira et al, 2019). In the Norwegian setting, Hardoy and Schøne (2013) find negative immigrant peer effects in upper secondary school.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows a variation in rates of academic achievement among immigrant students and children of immigrants [33,34]. For example, Rodríguez et al [35] found that native students performed better in science and mathematics.…”
Section: Academic Achievement For Immigrant Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%