The Influence of Forgiveness on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning Individuals’ Shame and Self‐Esteem

Greene, Darrell C.; Britton, Paula J.

doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00086.x

Cited by 33 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Collective self-esteem is an appraisal of one's social identity (Crocker & Major, 1989). Among LGBTQ individuals, higher self-esteem has been associated with higher self-forgiveness (Greene & Britton, 2013), lower shame proneness (Greene & Britton, 2013), religiosity (Dahl & Galliher, 2010), early acceptance/recognition of an LGBTQ identity (Swann & Spivey, 2004), family acceptance (Snapp, Watson, Russell, Diaz, & Ryan, 2015), social support and social connectedness (Austin & Goodman, 2017), active coping (Zea, Reisen, & Poppen, 1999), outness (Kosciw, Palmer & Kull, 2015), and collective self-esteem (Zea et al, 1999). Higher levels of self-esteem are thought to help reduce anxiety (Pyszczynski et al, 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The minority strengths model: Development and initial path analytic validation in racially/ethnically diverse LGBTQ individuals

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The minority stress model and much research based upon it tend to adopt and reinforce a deficit‐based approach. This study created and initially validated the minority strengths model, which by contrast outlines how personal and collective strengths in minority populations create resilience and positive mental and physical health. Materials and Method A sample of 317 lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds completed a national online survey. Results A minority strengths path model was generated with statistically significant paths and good fit indices, including all possible significant indirect effects. The model explained 16.8% of the variance in identity pride, 19.7% in self‐esteem, 32.9% in resilience, 41.6% in mental health, and 13.0% in positive health behaviors. Conclusions The minority strengths model holds promise to stimulate research on the personal and collective strengths of minority populations and the ways in which strengths generate resilience and positive mental and physical health.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The minority strengths model: Development and initial path analytic validation in racially/ethnically diverse LGBTQ individuals

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Quanto aos participantes, observa-se que, assim como na revisão anterior, os estudos recentes sobre o autoperdão também têm trabalhado predominantemente com estudantes universitários, até mesmo para tratar de questões específicas como problemas com álcool (Webb et al, 2013a), desordem alimentar (Feibelman, & Turner, 2015), sintomas depressivos (Hirsch et al, 2011), personalidade boderline (Law, & Chapman, 2015), problemas com jogo (Squires et al, 2012), vício em cigarros (Wohl, & Thompson, 2011) e vivência de violência íntima (Davidson et al, 2015). Apesar de em menor quantidade, foram encontrados estudos que trabalharam com populações específicas e não universitárias, como idosos (Cheavens et al, 2016;Ingersoll-Dayton, Torges, & Krause, 2010;Krause, 2015), mulheres com câncer de mama (Friedman et al, 2007;Romero et al, 2006), minorias sexuais LGBTQ (Greene, & Britton, 2013), adolescentes que praticam ou praticaram autoinjúria (Westers, Rehfuss, Olson, & Biron, 2012) e estudos de casos com pacientes com doença crônica (Hong, & Jacinto, 2012) e desordem alimentar (anorexia) (Lander, 2012).…”

Section: Metodologias Utilizadas Nos Estudos Sobre Autoperdãounclassified

O Perdão sob a Perspectiva do Ofensor: uma Revisão da Sistemática

Alencar

Abreu

2019

Psicol. cienc. prof.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo: Neste estudo foram realizadas revisões sistemáticas sobre as atitudes para receber o perdão e para perdoar a si mesmo. Considerando a escassez de estudos e relevância dos temas, o objetivo foi conhecer a forma como essas atitudes foram investigadas nas publicações recentes. O levantamento dos artigos foi realizado no portal Periódicos Capes, sendo selecionados estudos publicados entre 2006 e 2016. Na revisão sobre receber o perdão foram utilizados os descritores: "receber o perdão" e "buscar o perdão", em português e inglês. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão foram selecionados 12 artigos. Destacou-se a predominância do interesse na investigação da motivação para receber o perdão, sendo este um dos objetivos da maioria dos estudos revisados. Estes estudos contribuíram para o conhecimento da atitude para receber o perdão ao estabelecer os fatores, condições ou variáveis que favorecem a motivação para o pedido de desculpas ou para buscar receber o perdão. No que se refere ao autoperdão, foi utilizado o descritor "autoperdão", em português e inglês. Foram selecionados 54 artigos após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão. Parte considerável dos estudos buscou delimitar e diferenciar os processos de autoperdão genuíno e de pseudo-autoperdão. Estes estudos procuraram estabelecer como é possível se perdoar genuinamente e exploraram as variáveis que tem um papel significativo nesse processo. Considera-se que as revisões realizadas poderão auxiliar estudos e atuações que busquem incentivar as atitudes para receber o perdão e para perdoar a si mesmo, possibilitando conhecimentos para que as atuações sejam mais efetivas. Palavras-chave:Receber o Perdão, Autoperdão, Revisão Sistemática.Abstract: This study carried out systematic reviews on the attitudes to receiving forgiveness and self-forgiveness. Considering the lack of studies and the relevance of the themes, the aim was to understand how these attitudes have been investigated in recent publications. The articles were collected through the Periódicos Capes portal, and studies published between 2006 and 2016 were selected. In the receiving forgiveness' review, the following descriptors were used: "receiving forgiveness" and "seeking forgiveness", in Portuguese and English. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 articles were selected. It was highlighted the predominance of interest in the investigation of the motivation to receiving forgiveness, being this one of the objectives of most of the studies reviewed. These studies contributed to the knowledge of the attitude to receive forgiveness by establishing the factors, conditions or variables that favor the motivation to apologize or to seek forgiveness. Regarding self-forgiveness, the descriptor "self-forgiveness", in Portuguese and English, was used. We selected 54 articles after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A considerable part of the studies sought to delimit and differentiate the processes of genuine self-forgiveness and pseudo self-forgiveness....

show abstract

“…Some may develop feelings of internalised homonegativity, namely, the perception and acceptance that being gay is negative (Reilly and Rudd 2006), or shame, which encapsulates a range of emotions such as humiliation, inferiority (Greene and Britton 2013) or even selfhatred (Irvine 2009). …”

Section: Gay Parented Families' Mechanisms To Manage Sexuality In Pubmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of gay and lesbian parented families’ travel motivations and destination choices: gaps in research and future directions

Lucena

Jarvis

Weeden

2015

Annals of Leisure Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic tourism research is traditionally concerned with individual decisions and fails to address the viewpoint of the family unit. Indeed, while family tourism remains unexplored, lesbian and gay parented family tourism is further overlooked, with little attention in tourism research given to families whose configurations do not fit the heteronormative model, namely, the 'mother-father-children' trinomial. This paper critically reviews the literature on the topics that offer insight into same-sex parented family tourism and identifies gaps in knowledge in four different areas: travel motivations, destination choice, family decision-making, and strategies used by lesbians and gay men to manage sexuality in public spaces. The paper ends with recommendations designed to progress theoretical and empirical research.

show abstract

The Influence of Forgiveness on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning Individuals’ Shame and Self‐Esteem

Cited by 33 publications

References 78 publications

The minority strengths model: Development and initial path analytic validation in racially/ethnically diverse LGBTQ individuals

The minority strengths model: Development and initial path analytic validation in racially/ethnically diverse LGBTQ individuals

O Perdão sob a Perspectiva do Ofensor: uma Revisão da Sistemática

A review of gay and lesbian parented families’ travel motivations and destination choices: gaps in research and future directions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About