1978
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-68-603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Fungi Isolated from Peach Twigs on the Pathogenicity of Cytospora cincta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
7

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Colony interaction and competition were studied using techniques based upon the methods of Royse & Ries (1978) and Chand & Logan (1984). Each medium was inoculated with a 5 mm diameter disc of antagonist positioned diametrically opposite a 5 mm diameter disc of pathogen.…”
Section: Colony Interaction and Competition In Dual Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Colony interaction and competition were studied using techniques based upon the methods of Royse & Ries (1978) and Chand & Logan (1984). Each medium was inoculated with a 5 mm diameter disc of antagonist positioned diametrically opposite a 5 mm diameter disc of pathogen.…”
Section: Colony Interaction and Competition In Dual Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples include the use of six agar media to study the interactions between the antagonist Fusarium lateritium (Nees) Link and S. sclerotiorum (Sitepu & Wallace, 1984) and two agar media to observe the effect of a range of antagonists aginst Cytospora cincta Sacc. (Royse & Ries, 1978). Although differences in growth and interactions were observed, the media all contained added nutrients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was entirely at random with three replicates. The percentage inhibition of radial growth I = [(C -T) / C] × 100 of R. solani and the width of the zone of inhibition between both colonies were recorded as described by Royse & Ries (1978). Mode of inhibition was assessed on a scale from 1 to 4, in which 1 = Mycelial growth of R. solani ceased due to overgrowth of T. harzianum, 2 = Partial inhibition of R. solani and interacting fungus but both grow slowly over each other, 3 = Mutual inhibition at a distance <2 mm, 4 = Growth of R. solani inhibited at a distance > 2 mm (Chand & Logan, 1984).…”
Section: Disease Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…b. Coeficiente de la forma, calculado a partir de la diferencia del eje lateral y el eje central (Santamaría et al, 2007). c. Porcentaje de inhibición del crecimiento radial = 100 * ((r1-eje C))/r1 (ecuación 1), donde r1 es el máximo radio de la colonia del hongo patógeno en cualquier dirección en la placa control (Royse and Ries, 1978). d. Porcentaje de inhibición de la zona de crecimiento.…”
Section: Variables Analizadasunclassified