The influence of gender on clinical examination skills of medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background: A graduating medical doctor is expected to be competent in physical examinations across all systems. The exploration of how gender affects the development of clinical skills has not been explored in an Arab context, despite cultural restrictions that make it more difficult for students and doctors to examine the opposite sex. Methods: A cross sectional survey was undertaken of graduating final year medical students in Northern Jordan. We asked about students' perceptions regarding factors that may impact the development of clinical skills potentially related to gender, and asked about the frequency of examinations performed during their training for intimate and general physical examinations on all patients, as well as patients of the opposite sex. We also asked about the students' confidence in performing the examinations (3-point Likert-scale). Comparison of male and female proportions was done using Chi square tests analysis. Results: One hundred eighty-eight final year students from 481 students (41%) completed the survey, 99 males and 89 females. The greatest factor given for impacting a student's clinical examination of a patient of the opposite sex was cultural or religious traditions. Overall male students perform more clinical examinations than female students, with the odds of a male conducting more than 10 cardiovascular examinations on any patient compared to female students being 2.07 (1.13-3.79) and as high as 3.06 (1.53-6.18) for thyroid examinations. However, females were significantly more likely to examine male patients than vice versa (0.49 (0.27-0.88) for cardiovascular and 0.39 (0.21-0.71) for respiratory examinations). The gender division was more prominent for intimate examinations, with a lower odds of males conducting breast 0.11 (0.04-0.28) and vaginal examinations 0.22 (0.02-1.98) and more male students conducting prostate examinations OR 11.00 (1.39-87.03) and male genitalia examinations OR 16.31 (3.75-70.94). Overall a large proportion of students had never performed common intimate clinical examinations at all. Conclusions: In our context, clinical exposure to both intimate and general clinical examinations differs significantly between male and female students. A greater awareness and more research on the influence of gender on clinical skill attainment in conservative cultures is needed with appropriate adaption of clinical teaching. Trial registration: Non interventional thus not required.

A structured multimodal teaching approach enhancing musculoskeletal physical examination skills among undergraduate medical students

“…The available evidence regarding clinical examination skills among male and female students suggests differences in their approaches. These differences could be influenced by the gender profile of facilitators, role models, patients’ profiles, type of clinical examinations, and other factors yet to be established [ 79 , 80 ]. While the gender differences cannot be denied, involving students of one gender could potentially standardize these factors among the participants and project the effects of the teaching approach in general.…”

Social intelligence, an elementary competence in the development of the doctor-patient relationship

“…Not understanding oneself individually, and consequently not understanding others, is a major obstacle in achieving a medical vocation. 63 It would be of great interest to evaluate the actual state of SI in medical practice since there is a great lack of research in this sense. However, the generalized opinion agrees on an urgent need to humanize medicine.…”

“…However, the generalized opinion agrees on an urgent need to humanize medicine. 63 The situation and the globalized context in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic have made us reflect on the importance of focusing our attention on the humanistic and scientific competences that can strengthen this anthropological need. 64 The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed a crucial aspect of the doctor-patient relationship.…”

Association between Gender and Clinical examination frequency and confidence of Medical Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Clinical examination is important for diagnosis and managment in many conditions, and can spare some money and time that might be misused in unnecessary investigations (3,4). Likewise, the absence of examination in the diagnostic process may negatively affect the relationship between the doctor and the patient (5). Also, training medical students by examining real patients is significant in medical schools (5).…”