2002
DOI: 10.1109/47.988359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of gender on collaborative projects in an engineering classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies in this category were comparative studies of beliefs and IT adoption behaviors of men and women -with the exception of two that focused only on women's IT usage (Ingram & Parker 2002;Parmar et al 2009). Most studies had balanced numbers of men and women -with the average ratio of women being 46%.…”
Section: Topic 2: It Adoption and Usagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most studies in this category were comparative studies of beliefs and IT adoption behaviors of men and women -with the exception of two that focused only on women's IT usage (Ingram & Parker 2002;Parmar et al 2009). Most studies had balanced numbers of men and women -with the average ratio of women being 46%.…”
Section: Topic 2: It Adoption and Usagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Popular culture has contributed to this perception through best-selling books, such as "Men are from Earth, Women are from Venus" (Gray, 1992) and "You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation" (Tannen, 2007). While some studies suggest that the perceived differences are more nuanced, less conclusive, and heavily contextual (Ingram & Parker, 2002;Jones, Ruff & Paretti, 2013), other studies have shown that gender can play an important role in the way males and females communicate interpersonally. Wolfe and Powell (2009), for example, found that female engineering students used more conciliatory language when communicating with male team members in order to avoid conflict or to achieve particular objectives.…”
Section: Role Of Gender In Interpersonal Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Second, marginalization can occur when an individual's work tasks are not validated or fully recognized by their peers or their instructors. [12][13][14] These biases can emerge when peers or instructors may simply not acknowledge a student's contributions or when they subsume that student's work under the group as a whole. This bias can manifest as the difference between "we did X" versus "Michael did X" or "we 3-D printed a model" versus "Beth created a CAD drawing so that we could 3D print a model.…”
Section: Group-learning Environments In Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%