Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The transformation of natural landscapes for agricultural purposes may severely affect wild bee and wasp reproduction. In this study, we located trap‐nests on 18 natural Mediterranean communities within agricultural areas to study the effects of landscape (% natural areas and heterogeneity) and local flowering communities (flower abundance and richness) on the total abundance and richness of solitary bees and wasps that nest within cavities. We also estimated several reproductive variables (number of nests, number of cells per nest, sex ratio, parasitoidism and survival) of the two most common species in the study system: the bee Osmia caerulescens and the wasp Ancistrocerus longispinosus. We found that total bee abundance increased with flower richness and landscape heterogeneity, while it decreased with flower abundance. Furthermore, our results indicated local and landscape effects on the focal species reproductive success, being overall stronger those at the local than at the landscape scale. Floral richness and abundance influenced the number of cells per nest. However, while the effect of flower abundance was positive in both cases, the effect of flower richness differed, being positive for O. caerulescens and negative for A. longispinosus. The percentage of natural habitats in the landscape had a positive additional effect on the number of cells per nest only in A. longispinosus. Besides, flower richness was positively related to the proportion of females in both species and increased O. caerulescens survival. Our findings stress the importance of considering different spatial scales for an effective conservation management that takes into account Hymenoptera reproduction.
The transformation of natural landscapes for agricultural purposes may severely affect wild bee and wasp reproduction. In this study, we located trap‐nests on 18 natural Mediterranean communities within agricultural areas to study the effects of landscape (% natural areas and heterogeneity) and local flowering communities (flower abundance and richness) on the total abundance and richness of solitary bees and wasps that nest within cavities. We also estimated several reproductive variables (number of nests, number of cells per nest, sex ratio, parasitoidism and survival) of the two most common species in the study system: the bee Osmia caerulescens and the wasp Ancistrocerus longispinosus. We found that total bee abundance increased with flower richness and landscape heterogeneity, while it decreased with flower abundance. Furthermore, our results indicated local and landscape effects on the focal species reproductive success, being overall stronger those at the local than at the landscape scale. Floral richness and abundance influenced the number of cells per nest. However, while the effect of flower abundance was positive in both cases, the effect of flower richness differed, being positive for O. caerulescens and negative for A. longispinosus. The percentage of natural habitats in the landscape had a positive additional effect on the number of cells per nest only in A. longispinosus. Besides, flower richness was positively related to the proportion of females in both species and increased O. caerulescens survival. Our findings stress the importance of considering different spatial scales for an effective conservation management that takes into account Hymenoptera reproduction.
Mason bees (Osmia. spp) can provide an alternative for crop pollination management in addition to the Western honeybees (Apis mellifera). Targeted evidence‐based guidelines can improve cost‐effective management of mason bees. Here, I test the effect of an attractant spray developed in the United States for improving the nesting preference for artificial trap nests of mason bees in Belgium. More specifically, this study investigates the effect of the attractant spray on the nesting preference and nesting performance of the European orchard bee (Osmia cornuta), as well as its effect on the infestation of nest‐associated macroparasites. The number of sealed nesting cavities was twice as high in the trap nests that were treated with the attractant spray. Nesting performance expressed as number of brood cells per cavity, successful cocoon formation, adult emergence, proportion of female bees in the offspring and the number of dead larvae was not different between the treated and the untreated nests. Overall infestation of macroparasites, and infestation of drosophilid flies in particular, were both twice as high in untreated nests. This study provides evidence that the attractant spray improves nesting preference and reduces macroparasite infestation in O. cornuta. The use of this attractant can provide growers and stakeholders with an effective management strategy to prevent infestation by macroparasites and promote efficient bee breeding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.