2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.10.243998
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of heart rate variability biofeedback on cardiac regulation and functional brain connectivity

Abstract: Background Heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback has beneficial influence on perceived stress and emotion regulation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of an HRV-biofeedback intervention on resting functional brain connectivity in healthy subjects. Methods The 8-week HRV biofeedback training was carried out in five sessions per week using a mobile app. A control group played jump‘n’run games instead of the training. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was conducted before and after th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…83 Neuroimaging data support the view that slow breathing acts via vagal pathways by increasing the functional connectivity between prefrontal and limbic networks involved in the emotion regulation. 84,85 Well-replicated evidence now exists, suggesting that increased parasympathetic control of the heart is associated with a reduction in perceived stress, depression, anxiety and fear. [34][35][36][37] It should be noted, however, that in this study, the lack of significant effects on HF-HRV points to a decrease in sympathetic activation (lower LF/HF) rather than pointing to an increase in parasympathetic activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83 Neuroimaging data support the view that slow breathing acts via vagal pathways by increasing the functional connectivity between prefrontal and limbic networks involved in the emotion regulation. 84,85 Well-replicated evidence now exists, suggesting that increased parasympathetic control of the heart is associated with a reduction in perceived stress, depression, anxiety and fear. [34][35][36][37] It should be noted, however, that in this study, the lack of significant effects on HF-HRV points to a decrease in sympathetic activation (lower LF/HF) rather than pointing to an increase in parasympathetic activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst our study augments prior findings which have heavily relied on associations between HRV and functional connectivity during rest by assessing heart-brain function in an active emotion regulatory context, the current study and the majority of prior work have typically relied on relatively static functional connectivity techniques. Although a few studies have examined transient HRV changes and functional connectivity using dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) techniques such as the sliding window approach (Chand et al, 2020; Chang et al, 2013; Schumann et al, 2021a), this method is limited by its reliance on arbitrary selection of truncated time windows to assess both functional connectivity and HRV, with the latter particularly affected by the shorter duration of the measurement period (Shaffer & Ginsberg, 2017; TaskForce, 1996). It would therefore be fruitful for future research to employ novel and alternative dFC methods that overcome existing constraints (e.g., co-activation pattern analysis; Liu et al, 2013, 2018) to determine associations between HRV and dynamic neural networks underlying adaptive and flexible regulation across the lifespan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of neuroimaging research lends support for the NIM and the link between HRV and emotion regulation-related brain function (Mather & Thayer, 2018; Sakaki et al, 2016; Schumann et al, 2021a; Steinfurth et al, 2018). Consistent with the notion that HRV serves as a measure of effective, inhibitory cortical-subcortical connectivity, individuals with higher HRV exhibit stronger resting medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)-amygdala functional connectivity (Nashiro et al, 2022; Sakaki et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations