2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of heel height on utilized coefficient of friction during walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, habitual wearing of standard HHSs got to produce ankle plantar flexion, while the knee has been shown to be more flexed with increased heel height [7,10,11]. Activity of the TA, quadriceps, and gastrocnemius muscles also increases with raised heel height, there were potentially contributed to instability of ankle joint [5][6][7]10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, habitual wearing of standard HHSs got to produce ankle plantar flexion, while the knee has been shown to be more flexed with increased heel height [7,10,11]. Activity of the TA, quadriceps, and gastrocnemius muscles also increases with raised heel height, there were potentially contributed to instability of ankle joint [5][6][7]10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People in different locations are likely to be surrounded by different sets of vaccination site opportunities and transportation networks; thus, they may exhibit different travel patterns in accessing different vaccination sites. Furthermore, the use of the friction coefficient value generates a spatial accessibility model that more realistically represents walking conditions (Marpet, 1996;Blanchette et al, 2011). This work used a friction coefficient value of 0.5 because this represents a conservative value for an ordinary pedestrian walking under many foreseeable conditions (Marpet, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches were used to avoid spuriously high RCOF values that can occur when F z is small: 1) excluding the first 5% of the stance phase (Blanchette et al, 2011) and 2) excluding F z values less than 50 N (Burnfield and Powers, 2007). Both approaches yielded identical results.…”
Section: Gait Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%