2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.01.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of high temperature due to high adhesion condition on rail damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(85 reference statements)
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the “Experimental results” section, it can be found that the running speed has a significant influence on the wheel–rail adhesion level. In the previous studies, 24,3538 the effect of speed on rolling contact behaviour is usually investigated involving a constant adhesion coefficient, i.e. ignore the decrease of adhesion coefficient with speed increasing.…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the “Experimental results” section, it can be found that the running speed has a significant influence on the wheel–rail adhesion level. In the previous studies, 24,3538 the effect of speed on rolling contact behaviour is usually investigated involving a constant adhesion coefficient, i.e. ignore the decrease of adhesion coefficient with speed increasing.…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ertz and Knothe, 22 Wu et al., 23 and Vo et al. 24 employed analytical and numerical methods to determine the temperature rise at the wheel–rail interface, and the temperature can reach more than 600 ℃. Such high temperatures can reduce the performance of the wheel and rail material including the yield stress, elastic modulus, and ultimate strength, 2527 hence plastic deformation can easily occur even subjected to a low load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For E and EP models, the material properties at the initial temperature were used. Temperature dependency parameters are listed in Tables I and II (Vo et al, 2015;Talamini et al, 2005).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation domain comprises of 25137 elements and 113777 nodes. To standardize the simulation, element size is decided by comparing results for three different element sizes with the analytical results (Srivastava et al, 2013) and numerical results (Vo et al, 2015) for the chosen contact loading zone. Thereby, it is found, 1 mm size to provide the best outcome as suggested in (Srivastava et al, 2014).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%