2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of human interaction on the vibration of hand-held human-machine systems – The effect of body posture, feed force, and gripping forces on the vibration of hammer drills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of rotational vibration excitation, Schröder et al (2022) also described a similar influence [34]. Hence, the observed effect of the applied gripping force on the RMI corresponds to the current literature [8,23,25,27,28,30,34,43,44].…”
Section: How Is the Rmi In Y H Direction Influenced By Gripping Forces?supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of rotational vibration excitation, Schröder et al (2022) also described a similar influence [34]. Hence, the observed effect of the applied gripping force on the RMI corresponds to the current literature [8,23,25,27,28,30,34,43,44].…”
Section: How Is the Rmi In Y H Direction Influenced By Gripping Forces?supporting
confidence: 74%
“…One option for validating these interactions is manual testing using sensor-equipped prototypes. However, manual tests are time consuming and offer only limited significance since the subject's mood and individual physical condition and behavior strongly influence the results [8]. Furthermore, the user's fatigue limits the number of possible test repetitions and the tests' reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an important approach is that the design strategy of vibration control and reduction in each category should be different based on several influencing factors. 7 The overall mean of 16.65 m/s 2 (14.66-20.04) in this study can be compared to 15.09 m/s 2 reported for five electric and pneumatic demolition hammers in real conditions, a mean of 12.78 m/s 2 for pneumatic hammers in the laboratory environment, and an average of 19 m/s 2 in 27 and 40 kg heavy demolition hammers under actual operating conditions. 4,15,16 In the study of De Silva and Wijewardana, 45 the hand-arm vibration exposure values for the x, y, and z axes was reported to be 23.3, 15.2, and 18.1 m/s 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, it should be noted that the values of other axes in the evaluation of exposure to these tools should never be ignored. However, in many studies, such as the study by Lindenmann et al, 7 only the evaluation was done in the vertical axis and the results of other axes were not even presented, which seems that it cannot be a correct approach in non-robotic and steady-state conditions, unless the accelerometer was attached on the instrument handle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation